<p>@pinkrose.
BTW, the question about without giving up value is not question 20; it was question 24.</p>
<p>also, question 23 was the one about the role of government and what passage 1 would think. i put misplaced, b/c government is no major threat. same for everyone else?</p>
<p>also, for question 13 of the same passage, i put difficult to maintain in a contemp world, as what both authors agree what privacy is. anyone else?</p>
<p>.5(2000)= 4000
109 digits
Area of Triangle inside semi circle = 30
4,5,5,6,6,7 = 2
Zeros between [-3,3] = 2
50 adults out of room
45X+15(x+2)=390
Container = 2.5
X-T= 15
2002/2005= 4/5
Perimeter = .25
Consecutive pattern of 2, -.5 -2
Union : m+k-4
Shirts: $4.50
Best fitting line: 2
Area of Triangle to rectangle: leg length = 8
X<25 ; any number from 22-24
3Y/2X=1
I and II only
OP = half the diameter</p>
<p>CR
Excoriate
Mitigate
Extemporize
Confound…Commonplace
Exacting…Disqualify
Strip malls are soulless
Ironically,
Halle Berry: no error
Were she to agree…
Invidious … Ivy growing onto lawn
Dark Side : ominous
Analogy : bionoculars
Simile : hands as old as sand
Uhmma : wanted children to use intellect
Tender = soft
24: Without giving up value
Drawbacks of a phenomenon
Scuba Diving metaphor: Cursory way of obtaining information
Incompatible with a romanticized view of nature
Reactions to a viewpoint/challenges
Depressed people : find the information heartening
23: misplaced, gov isn’t a threat
13: difficult to maintain privacy in our world
Neglected Viewpoint
Hundred monitors: help economy efficiency</p>
<p>Writing
But it,
Canada no error
Halle Berry no error
Were she to agree
Sentence went after five
Hybrid: benefits were
Silenced…roused
Than that of any monarch
Either would be a good PET not pets
Dog sled racing: Had driven</p>
<p>I had misplaced, because one of the sentences in the passage said that, the future invader of privacy would not be an all-seeing government. So author 1 would think that government is not a factor.</p>
<p>for the CR passage about gardens, i think there was a question about the overall purpose, i think i said something about a neglected viewpoint. sound familiar to anyone?</p>
<p>also, free from human interference for gardens?</p>
<p>btw, it can’t be nostalgia, because you have to determine tone from just those lines, and it didn’t extend into the “i think this is unfortunate”
all he said was “gardens were essentially banished from American nature writing” </p>