<p>Haha, no, the prize is not gratitude.</p>
<p>Are we playing Twenty Questions about the prize?</p>
<p>Nope. In Twenty Questions, there’s a possibility of finding out.</p>
<p>Hi this is BillyMc posting from another account. To answer Harry, yes we are playing 20 questions about the prize.</p>
<p>
Why would I use the same type of speech on a different account?</p>
<p>Wait, of course I would deny it was another account, that makes more sense.</p>
<p>Hi, me.</p>
<p>Talking to oneself is lolzy.</p>
<p>I have also found it humorous at times. It is not very productive, however.</p>
<p>Who cares about **** like that? If you enjoy it, do it.</p>
<p>That is a poor argument, logically speaking. There are many aspects to consider other than pleasure when deciding up on which course to pursue.</p>
<p>Productive? What are trying to produce? Happiness? A better world?</p>
<p>You’re irritating the **** out of me. Also, EXAMPLES when arguing.</p>
<p>^I don’t agree with you Harry. e.g. You are wrong.</p>
<p>EDIT: Billy, you think we have the same type of speech? Do you mean English?</p>
<p>
Anything other than persons having MPD.</p>
<p>In reply to HarryJones: For example, it is unacceptable to osculate a strange girl, even if it would be pleasurable.
Lawl, I’ve waited for days to use that word. <3</p>
<p>Osculate is such an awesome word!</p>
<p>Inorite?</p>
<p>'k, bye.</p>
<p>You get “Word of the Day”, don’t you.</p>
<p>
We’re using roughly the same level of vocabulary. Not much beyond that is perceptible on the internet.</p>
<p>
Merci, mon cher.</p>
<p>Danke, mein Sonny</p>
<p>EDIT: I wouldn’t say perceptible. Perceivable suits my palate more.
EDIT: Of course, I wouldn’t deign to usurp Mifune’s role as bombastic orator; I should like to think that it might place too large an onus on my lackadaisical internet personality</p>
<p>I learned the word “osculate” when I took multivariable calculus.</p>