<p>You know the drill: scale of 1-6, 6 being best, SAT II: Writing grader-style.</p>
<p>Please excuse me for making any historical inaccuracies. My excuse is that a twenty minute timer really scrambles my brain.</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>Prompt: Computers, word processors, and other modern technological devices make it unnecessary for people to know how to write well in their everyday lives.</p>
<p>Before there were computers and word processors, there was the printing press. It was a breakthrough when it first appeared, for it gave the masses the written version of what they had been saying, but could not express because of the educational deficiencies of the time. Alas, this invention proved to be only marginally helpful: the literacy of the general populace did not increase. This was because they had become complacent, i.e. instead of learning to read for themselves, they were content to listen to another person read to them, just as it had been before the printer had come about. Herein lies the problem: technological devices cannot replace writing ability.</p>
<p>Going back to the example mentioned above, the people did not have a general education available to them until modern times. In the meantime, most of them did not bother to learn the skill of writing. When the modern age finally arrived (and with it the establishment of public schools), people finally got the chance to learn how to write. Eventually, the literacy rate of the populace rose to its present number. Was this related to the printing press? Not in any way! The people could not benefit from the printer; they had to wait until other humans could instruct them on the art of writing.</p>
<p>The underlying reason for the presence of people who known how to write is that it fosters communication. Nonverbal and verbal sounds alike can get some of that job done. But some words and expressions are better put in writing. It is these written things that are remembered by future generations, not ephemeral gestures and spoken words. In essence, it is vital that people know how to write, so that posterity may come to understand what these people had to say. It is essentially a means of preserving civilization. True, technological devices are a part of civilization as well. And yet, they can only assist in spreading the word. The true message comes from a person's writing.</p>
<p>-</p>
<p>Prompt: Some people criticize city life for being dangerous, expensive, and noisy. Others describe country living as dull, culturally empty, and narrow. Where do you stand?</p>
<p>If I had to choose between the urban and the rural, I would pick the former. Yes, I might be selecting the more dangerous, more expensive, and noisier choice. But that not need necessarily be the case. </p>
<p>The city if often criticized for being a place of danger. While this observation is certainly true, there are safeguards against these dangerous things, namely, the police force. They are perhaps the most powerful organization in the city itself, and thus have the means to take on treacherous people, events, and other such shady material. If someone would only place his trust in the police, then he would certainly be guaranteed safety in his urban life.</p>
<p>Another criticism of the city is that is far too pricey. Yes, this is one of those anti-amenities country folk like to point out. But there is a solution: suburbs. Almost every city has them, and they are often much cheaper than what could be found in the inner metropolis. They may not always be more affordable, but city dwellers should be happy to have this alternative outlet.</p>
<p>A third strike against the city is that it is just too loud. With people, machines, and all sorts of other entities, this is to be expected. And yet, there are places within the city that are free or almost free of commotion. They can take on the form of museums or parks. In the former, it is mandated that people keep quiet; in the latter, there is a natural obligation to preserve the peace. There are countless other places of solace, particularly libraries, but these two areas are the most prominent of the places one could go to if he wishes to experience tranquility.</p>
<p>Those three criticisms are just a few of many aimed at discouraging people from living in a city. However, they can be remedied, and the rewards for staying in a city are rich: always something to do, always people to meet, and just a wide array of everything good and bad. If this is the price I pay for wanting to live in a city, then let me fork over my life savings.</p>