<p>I heard that past a certain threshold, all scores are similar. I heard that this threshold was 2200 - that someone with a 2200 was ballpark similar to someone with a 2400, if they have similar ECs and whatnot. Is this true? Should I retake?</p>
<p>CR - 700
M - 740
W - 760</p>
<p>This was my 2nd time taking the SAT. And I really don't want to study because school is starting tomorrow. Thoughts?</p>
<p>Which ivy are you talking about or applying to? It all depends on the school to me.</p>
<p>If its Cornell or brown and you have a excellent GPA to top it off…honestly your time is better spent on perfecting your ECs and such. A 2200 is beautiful btw ;-)</p>
<p>If its HYP (Harvard etc) then I think you should aim higher…but honestly the acceptance to these schools is a crap shoot for ANYONE! don’t worry too much…for these schools I can only offer one tip:
Your SATs are fine, but make yourself stand out from the other applicants … Seriously!!! Prove you DO something to impact your community or world!</p>
<p>You seem to be a brilliant student and you’ll definitely have a chance at these big name schools ;)</p>
<p>I haven’t heard about the “threshold theory” using a 2200 SAT score. I believe it may have been intended for someone with a 2300 PLUS versus a perfect 2400 SAT score. Top-tier Ivy schools will GENERALLY require a higher score than a 2200, unless you are a hooked applicant or have some very distinctive awards or achievements. There are exceptions and you may be one of them-- you never know until you apply.</p>
<p>Cornell I believe considers mainly CR + M. So your numbers could be low by that measure. If some senior members are to be believed, Ivys also underweigh Math and give more weight to CR since it is a better measure for liberal arts.</p>
<p>Now you just have to prove you are an interesting human being who won’t be out of place amongst the thousands of other interesting human beings at these schools.</p>