Risky not to take a science senior year?

<p>I'm a freshman, but under my current plan my sciences would look like this</p>

<p>Freshman
Gifted Chemistry
Sophomore
AP/IB SL Chemistry, AP/IB SL Physics
Junior
AP/IB SL Bio
Senior
Nothing </p>

<p>Would that be a problem to colleges, not having four years of a core subject? I'm pretty sure it'd be okay, but not entirely.</p>

<p>I'm only taking AP Chem next year because our course selection isn't that great for AP/IB electives (req. for IB Program, which I'm entering as a soph, don't ask)...</p>

<p>Nope. Sounds good to me...a majority of the kids at my school don't take science senior year (including myself).</p>

<p>It looks like you're doubling up on Chem and Physics one year, rather than doing the more typical one science subject per year. Any particular reason why you or your school chooses to do it that way?</p>

<p>You've got 3 AP science courses, I don't see a problem, though I might hesitate if you were applying to an engineering school.</p>

<p>Do you plan on majoring in a science?</p>

<p>No, I will almost definitely not major in science (never say never...) </p>

<p>I'd usually choose to double up on humanities, which I love, but our school doesn't offer any social science courses for the program besides the required (US History). It's frustrating for me because I really want to take Economics, Psychology, and European History :( </p>

<p>Would it make my course selection look weak to selective colleges if I didn't take a science senior year? I'd probably be taking advanced classes in every other core subject plus 2 foreign languages.</p>