<p>In answer to whether music students are ‘recruited’, I think the answer is it depends on what you mean. The music admissions process in a nutshell is a)you have to pass the audition and b)there needs to be a teacher willing to teach you. If a teacher knows a prospective student and really likes them, it could be they ‘reserve’ a slot for them, which means if they had 2 slots open i.e two students were leaving his studio, in effect he would only take 1 student out of the audition process if the ‘reserved’ student in fact passes the audition (obviously if the student he liked didn’t pass, they might end up taking someone off the wait list). </p>
<p>I suspect (don’t have proof) that at ‘up and coming’ conservatories, those trying to establish credibility, will in effect recruit top tier students, to bring their levels up, and it could be that they basically are in, that the audition if it happens is a formality (this happens all the time with auditioned summer programs…). </p>
<p>Could a teacher have some student in mind and totally bypass the admissions process, basically say “I want X, and that is it?”. I am sure it goes on, but I also suspect these are students who are already out there and quite frankly would pass the audition anyway. One thing with music teachers is despite what they say, I suspect they all have healthy egos, and they really want their students to look good (remember, in conservatory, students go in front of juries and are measured all the time), and they wouldn’t bring someone in who doesn’t meet the standards of the program, it would be embarrassing.</p>
<p>Does that mean teachers don’t have the power to say “I want X, and that is it…”? No, not at all, where a single teacher decides admission then obviously they have that power, and I also have heard anecdotal evidence in certain programs where with auditions, teachers ‘bargain’ i.e they say “let x in and I’ll support y”, but I am not too certain that goes on, because again, that implies trying to get a student in who isn’t up to snuff or something…I also have heard the many conspiracy theories, that certain teachers are bribed by well off families to get their kid in, etc, and while I have sat in recitals at top level schools where I wondered how the person got in, I also doubt that is common, at least here in the US, it could be different internationally. Among other things, if a student needed a bribe to get in, it would imply they weren’t very good, and other teachers would start to wonder…:).</p>
<p>Want my honest opinion? It doesn’t matter…the process of admissions is not scientific, it is not really objective, and you have to accept that if you are bothering to audition. You have to go into each audition knowing it is a grind, knowing it is a crapshoot, and that even if you know teachers in the program that is only 1 piece in the puzzle, it is one of the first tastes of what it means to be a musician, you have to shrug that off, and simply go out, audition, and let the cards fall where they may. It is a brutal process with yes, more then a bit of unfairness in it, in the sense that getting in may require a certain amount of serendipity (for example, that the audition doesn’t happen when you are running a 102 degree fever, the panel isn’t in a cranky mood because they haven’t eaten lunch, the members on the panel happen to like the student’s style who is auditioning, the moon is in the 7th house, a slot opened up because a student quit to become a judge on American Idol, etc…), and the fact is whatever goes into auditions is as it is; I personally feel that the audition criteria itself is seriously skewed, but given that I am not on the faculty of the schools, not a muscian or music teacher, which means it means nothing:). Not saying people don’t have the right to feel nonplussed about aspects of getting in, one of the nice parts about a forum like this is we also can vent:)</p>