<p>Hello!</p>
<p>I'm a transfer student from RIT and have applied to seven schools (SAIC, CalArts, Pratt, Parsons, Parsons Paris, CCAD, and SFAI) and have gotten into all of them for fall 2010. I'm a photography transfer who is also interested in film. I think I've narrowed it down to SAIC and CalArts (pending full ride at any of the other schools, haha). I'm having the HARDEST time figuring out where I want to go, I have eight days!!!</p>
<p>I was wondering if anyone (current students preferably, but all comments welcome!) could give me some insight on either photography program. I'm very much into fine art photo, and coming from RIT (verrrry technically based) I feel that it's my time to experiment with different concepts.</p>
<p>I have researched both schools and visited. From my basic knowlesdge, the best photo undergraduate schools are ranked Yale, SAIC, then RIT. I have no idea where Cal Arts is on that list, and am afraid for my future if I go to Cal Arts over SAIC, just because I feel that SAIC grads have more opportunities? I plan to attend Yale Grad (hopefully!)</p>
<p>I'm also worried about the fluidness between diciplines at SAIC. From what I've heard, it's hard to use any other programs equipment. I would want to do some film in school, and Cal Arts had a great solution for this.</p>
<p>I'm also worried, I've heard both schools as being "dried up programs from their 70's heyday" I want a good program, not a has-been.</p>
<p>I originally transferred from RIT with intentions of going to a city school. I left because it was in the middle of nowhere, the program was a JOKE, and I fell out of touch with my only friends. It was very lonely and isolating, which is also how I've heard SAIC described. More worries.</p>
<p>So, in all... </p>
<p>Who has a better fine-art photo program?</p>
<p>Which school is better to graduate from?</p>
<p>Which program has the ability to utilize other equipment?</p>
<p>WHO IS HAPPIER?</p>