Sat 1 june 2012

<p>In the Nanima story, was the answer to the question about how the children were viewing the argument childish something? Also fun fact in Hindi Nani means grandmother.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Don’t remember, more details ?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I put - close attention.</p>

<p>If your’e watching tennis and looking from side to side, you’re paying close attention to the ball. Otherwise you wouldn’t care and sit back and relax or something.</p>

<p>connection6 or 7 circles with 8 radii</p>

<p>and circumferences of 4pi</p>

<p>I believe it was 12.</p>

<p>circumference 4pi means radius 2.</p>

<p>Then it was half a circle (+2), two full circles (+8) , half a circle (+2), if I remember correctly.</p>

<p>From A to E, asking the length.</p>

<p>Wait, but I don’t think E was on the center…</p>

<p>Possible.
It will come down to arithmetic but you seem to understand what they wanted.</p>

<p>Anyone else remembers ?</p>

<p>I got 4 as well for the triangle. X-axis points, (2,1) and (2, -1)
And I got 12 for the overlapping/tangent circles question.</p>

<p>Did anyone have experimental math that wasn’t a grid in? </p>

<p>Does anyone remember if there was a question with 5 dots and they asked you how many lines would be drawn to connect each pair?</p>

<p>If anyone else had experimental math that was all mc if you recall some of the questions could you please post. I’m trying to see which one was the experiment but I think it was section 2 on my test and this is the only one I can recall</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>No experimental math for me.</p>

<p>Should be 4 + 3 + 2 + 1 =10. That’s what I did.</p>

<p>that was 10.</p>

<p>I got 10 but that wasn’t an experimental section it was legit?
It anyone has experimental math please post because I know I did but did not have any question with a girl wrapping a box</p>

<p>What about a question with a graph of a pool being filled then emptied and it asked you for p-n was this one real or in the experimental?</p>

<ol>
<li>2400-1600</li>
</ol>

<p>

</p>

<p>Don’t recall this one, could have been experimental.</p>

<p>Wasn’t it 2400-800=1600?</p>

<p>Yeah, 1600. </p>

<ul>
<li>What did you get for the question about Passage 1 of the 2 college passages: What rhetorical device did the author of passage 1 use in that long paragraph? </li>
</ul>

<p>Was it analogical reasoning or repetition? Or metephorical something?</p>

<p>There was two grid-in sections on mine. I guess (sorry Im kinda unaware of this) that means one of them is experimental right?</p>