<p>I don’t have an absolutist attitude, I’m just defending my points of view brah…so far I’m convinced I’ve only missed 2-3 but no one is compiling any more answers.</p>
<p>No they weren’t. objectionable was used with systematically support</p>
<p>Oh, you’re right. But what does <em>systematically</em> support mean? And what did espouses go with, if you remember?</p>
<p>so far this is the agreed on by the forum compilation of cr answers.</p>
<p>Passage 1 and Passage 2</p>
<p>idealistic<br>
realistic
fund./simply
civics/and career of childrens
helping children with their interests
snide
higher education
anticipate/response
repetition
objectionable, systematic</p>
<p>Mini</p>
<p>Dramatic
pivotal to world success</p>
<p>defining a quality
fragile</p>
<p>Mini
question/response
Sensory-
why he had use electric
different perspectives</p>
<p>Long Passage:</p>
<p>obedient bully commanding adamant cooking conflict resent criticism familiar experiences CLOse attention rising indignation</p>
<p>provide a context </p>
<p>Long P:</p>
<p>hard to believe
recent info
novices alike
planets clear
eflective informstive
comical anecdote
emphemeral
simile
LONG P:</p>
<p>novelty
pompous and stuffy
evocative
atypical
correct
holds
understandly unreliable</p>
<p>Sentence ComP :
adequate pinpoint
shortcomings
easygoing
disconcert/furnish
peremptory/ordeal
eludes
assiduous
primacy
trifling
confounded inscrutable
neophyte
circumvent
consensus dislkey</p>
<p>Let’s clear this up first, I’m not your brah. I understand you’re defending your answer but your methods were too abrasive for me to stay quiet. The onoy passage I’m concerned with is the kid who becomes an astronomer</p>
<p>Lol then stop treating me like you’re my high school mate…because I’m not. Stop insulting me, I’m stating my opinion if you don’t like it, simply leave.</p>
<p>The questioin with systematically and espouse definitely ended up being espouses.</p>
<p>Wait- back to the cotton for a moment. Do we remember for sure what the question asked? Was it “III: There must be at least 5 other states…”
Or “III: There must be more than 5 other states…”</p>
<p>I don’t remember, but we could be going in the wrong direction</p>
<p>Alright littledarkman, I don’t care if you are intimidated by me for challenging the obviously questionable veracity of one if your answers, don’t flatter yourself by telling me to do anything. I’m not insulting you, I’d just prefer you explain your reasons instead of just saying ‘‘I’m sorry but you’re wrong get over it’’ like you’re the final word. That’s all.</p>
<p>Um, shouldnt i think i put down E for this one. The “have” is in agreement with “policies” which is a plural noun. Right?</p>
<p>There must be at least more than 5 states… that means 5 is allowed. necessary and sufficient. meaning it’s incorrect. Trust me on this one i had 3 different review books.</p>
<p>I thought it was have btw… have in that case was present tense and it was in the past.</p>
<p>“at least more than 5 states” means that 5 is not included. Therefore, makes the answer correct.</p>
<p>At least cannot be coupled with more! More means more; at least would stand alone . The sentence structure is incorrect when at least and more are place together . Please rethink it out!</p>
<p>Again, we need to team up and file complaints about this question.</p>
<p>Our future in college should not be determined by how well we can measure a picture of cotton.</p>
<p>At least 6 is included in at least 5. Any number that is atleast 6 is also at least 5. Therefore, even IF you were correct, III would still work.</p>
<p>@Agrasin</p>
<p>i already reported it, but it would have more weight if others did too</p>
<p><a href="mailto:satquestion@info.collegeboard.org">satquestion@info.collegeboard.org</a> -email adress</p>
<p><a href=“The SAT – SAT Suite | College Board”>The SAT – SAT Suite | College Board; - website</p>
<p>It wasn’t a question of plural/singular matching. The senator had already failed to be elected, because he already HAD disagreed with people’s policies or whatever.</p>
<p>@Agrasin’s Writing problem. I remember that question, and I had a math experimental, so that question was real. I put several months ago as the answer because it was missing a comma.</p>
<p>The cotton question for number 3 said there are at least 5 more states blah blah. The total produced was 14.9, and 10.75 was shown. Therefore, 4.15 was left. And since North Carolina was basically .75, any states below it had to be less than or equal to .75 So even if they were all .75, .75 x 5 = 3.75, which is obviously lower than 4.15. So III was correct, as were the other two, so it was all of them.</p>