<p>Are you sure there wasn’t another choice for the flower one? I can’t remember what I put–it might have been undistinguished–but that seems like a weird way to describe a flower, especially after calling its flowers “diminutive” and its roots “scraggly” or something.</p>
<p>Also, the “adroitness”/“residual” one. Why isn’t “dexterity” right? That doesn’t quite fit adroitness, and the whole point of the sentence was that there WAS residual effects?</p>
<p>why was the answer to the boy walking under the hole in the wall freedom and not creativity? what was the volatile one for biofuel? and any other questions from the biofuel/other cr sections? i need this to see if i need to cancel my scores!</p>
<p>if you saw a flower with a straggly (bumpy, disordered, harsh, brittle) stem and tiny little faded purple flowers, would you consider that normal (undistinguished) or unsightly (not pretty to look at)? i would say unsightly</p>
<p>The first paragraph in the barbara jordan was not for historical context, it was obviously to establish the author’s reputation as a diplomat. This was for the barbara jordan. Please correct the list.</p>
<p>@JHU Bound
Yes. This was the correct answer, but this section was experimental</p>
<p>@anon: definitely. Now that I remember unsightly, I know that’s what I put and it’s right. At least I have a chance at a 760+, as I haven’t found any passage-based reading wrong. What about “adroitness/residual?”</p>
<p>Could anyone confirm the answer to the question about the importance of teh first paragraph in the jordan passage. THANK YOu!! Is it historical context or to establish credentials as a diplomat before talking about Jordan?</p>
<p>Thanks anonymous. Does anyone still think that -4 or -5 might be about 750? Is there any chance considering the difficulty level of this Critical reading.</p>