<p>any1 got a sat equivlancy scale between the old sat and the new sat</p>
<p>The math and verbal sections are equivalent to the old math and verbal sections, so just look at your M+CR score out of 1600. Also, you could multiply the new SAT score by 2/3 to get an approximate equivalent to your total score.</p>
<p>I would say don't multiply it by 2/3... that's really silly. It's like saying... multiply your ACT score by (1600/36) to get an old sat equivelant.</p>
<p>Just take your math score and compare it directly, or take your CR score and compare it directly to an old verbal score.</p>
<p>Bog, multiplying your new SAT score (out of 2400) would give you a score out of 1600 because of simple proportions (dividing the score by 3 would give you the average in each individual section and multiplying by 2 would give you a score based on a 1600 maximum scale).</p>
<p>I... I know...</p>
<p>A score of 29 on the act is around a 1290 on old sat according to many scales and multiplying by 1600/36 works...</p>
<p>Well, sure it works, but is that useful? Is that how colleges compare them?! Well I can tell you for sure that colleges don't compare the new sat to the old by proportionating the composite, which isn't even a real number, I believe... we just add them up ourselves. My point is, if you get an 800 CR/800 M/600 W, i wouldnt say you got a 1530, I'd say you got a 1600. Sure you can proportionate it, and it "works," but I don't see why that would be useful because you're comparing incomparable things.</p>
<p>I don't know if this one is accurate but it's what I use!</p>