<p>Did anybody taking the IIC use Rusen Meylani tests to study with, and how did they compare to the real thing? Any help would be appreciated, thanks!</p>
<p>Somebody had to have taken the test after practice with Meylani tests.</p>
<p>bump i'd like to know about this too</p>
<p>Do u got the Rusen tests Silver? They seem to be more on track than Barrons. I'm gonna take the real test in the CB subject test book, and then take a rusen test and compare.</p>
<p>If those are the turkish tests, they are harder than the SAT II</p>
<p>They are. They are the ones bought from Amazon, how much harder are they? Are they a median between the real IIC and Barrons? or should I go buy a PR book to get an accurate test?</p>
<p>My friends who used those fun turkish tests felt that they were harder than the IIc</p>
<p>Sweet, thanks for the reply.</p>
<p>hey does anyone know about rusen meylani's 15 reaalistic 2c tests?</p>
<p>they would be the same as his 10 as far as realistic.</p>
<p>Noooo! Don't get the meylani tests</p>
<p>I took the meylani IIc tests. They were 25x harder than the actual thing...not only are the problems impossible, the thing has endless typos, missing answers, wrong problems, etc. The guy's website even has huge lists of corrections--check it.</p>
<p>The IIc really isn't that hard...I also used the easy sparknotes study guide--it was actually a lot closer to the real thing.</p>
<p>So get PR or sparknotes or something like that, but definitely NOT rusen meylani.</p>
<p>yeah, the Meylani are tougher I think, I got 660, 660, 630 in my practices and took the real one from the real SAT II's and got a 730.</p>
<p>Those who choose to use my books, I thank you all.</p>
<p>Yeah, I think the score won't be accurate but his tests will prepare you for the hardest 60% of the questions on the test, and if u know those, you should be able to get the easier ones.</p>
<p>Hi, I am Rusen Meylani.</p>
<p>As for the level of my tests, I am trying to make them harder than the real test, the reason is I believe that a student must be trained with harder questions so that the real tests will be easier.</p>
<p>As for realistic, I believe they are. Here is what I do while preparing the questions, I get a lot of feedback from my students who take the real SAT's and the other teachers in my team who constantly go over every source on the SAT's. We then "guess" what might be asked in the coming exams and try to produce every version of any question likely to appear.</p>
<p>For example f(|x|) and |f(x)| are often confused by the students. However these are only 2 of the 30 transformations that may ever appear on the SAT questions on advance graphing of functions.</p>
<p>We then test our questions on our students among which there are many valedictorians who are really good in math. Then we make the test harder or easier, but we do try to maintain a certain level of difficulty. Then we revise the questions over and over again and finally decide on which tests to publish. Those on my book "15 Realistic Tests" are selected among 50 tests.</p>
<p>The solutions, however assume a certain level of knowledge as we do think that the Level 2 test (formerly known as 2C) is like a contest among the students interested in math more than others.</p>
<p>As for the language errors, we do apologize because English is not our native language.</p>
<p>I hope this information will help you.</p>
<p>On the other hand I have opened a thread where I will be willing to answer any questions or listen to any suggestions and comments to make my books better. </p>
<p>Best of luck to you all.</p>