Sat II Physics: Review Book

<p>Hello, I am prepping for the Sat physics exam and I'm aiming for an 800 ( isn't everyone though?) on the upcoming exam.</p>

<p>I took physics my freshman year, and am going to take AP this year as a senior.
The book I currently have is
McGraw Hill 5 Steps to a 5 AP Physics B and C
McGraw-Hill:</a> 5 Steps to a 5 AP Physics B and C : Book</p>

<p>I know of:
Barron's SAT Subject Test in Physics
Amazon.com:</a> Barron's SAT Subject Test in Physics (9780764136634): Herman Gewirtz, Jonathan S. Wolf: Books
Cracking the SAT Physics Subject Test, 2011-2012 Edition
Amazon.com:</a> Cracking the SAT Physics Subject Test, 2011-2012 Edition (College Test Preparation) (9780375428135): Princeton Review: Books
Kaplan SAT Subject Test: Physics 2011-2012 Edition
Amazon.com:</a> Kaplan SAT Subject Test Physics 2011-2012 (9781607148739): Hugh Henderson: Books</p>

<p>I am aware that the Barron's book ( like many many other books) contains several mistakes, and I don't know how good kaplan is, but I'm waiting on it from the library.</p>

<p>Would AP 5 Steps book suffice for the SAT or does anyone have any recommendations?</p>

<p>Bump, wow 170 views and no replies >.<</p>

<p>After reading through the forums here and Amazon.com reviews, I’ve seen some very mixed reviews. <em>My</em> understanding is that Barron’s is not as good as their variant for chemistry; Princeton Review and Spark Notes have accurate tests and good explanations and Kaplan’s tests are a litte too easy but their explanations are clear.</p>

<p>I’ve only got the Kaplan book but I intend to supplement that with Spark Notes. I can vouch for the clarity of explanations. In some instances, I did get confused, but that was largely due to how I was taught the material. For example, when dealing with a mass X which is in equilibrium due to it being attached to two strings, Kaplan’s book refers to the weight of X as a “tension” (iirc), which I found quite odd to say the least. But perhaps that’s not a mistake and just a “cultural difference” or some other minor thing. At any rate, clear explanations for the most part.</p>

<p>Thanks I really appreciate the response.</p>