<p>so the last couple are eluding us?</p>
<p>It's probably some really easy ones that we're not remembering...</p>
<p>i got -7 lol. what does that mean</p>
<p>i think 77-78 will be 800.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the exact question for 72. Injunction - UNIONS AND LABORERS.</p>
<p>So we use (90 - # of Qs Omitted) - (#of Qs wrong*.25)=Raw</p>
<p>Right?</p>
<p>no we don't sorry</p>
<p>Ugg...okay to all you haters out there who say that it is not inheritance laws, you're wrong.
First off, the British did not have "inheritance traditions." They had very strict inheritance laws. The first born SON received all the inheritance. No females were allowed to claim inheritance. Also, because everything went toward the first born son, the sons after that were screwed. So, many immigrated to America to set up their own fortune or work as an indentured servant. Even after they immigrated though, the inheritance laws were enforced in the colonies. So yeah...that was my inheritance rant...lols, sorry if I seem to be a bit crazy, but I just had to get that off my chest...</p>
<p>UCLA. Im sure you just guessed to an answer but you dont remember it, so you assumed you ommited it.</p>
<p>ucla dreamer calm down, you can omit 11 and still get an 800</p>
<p>raw score 79+ = 800 according to the blue book
78 - 790
77 - 780
etc.</p>
<p>goodness gracious</p>
<p>even then, 4 or 5 wrong is still an 800, so why cancel? and a 780 or so still is very very good</p>
<p>Oh <em>snap, snap</em>...gradeinflation it's on!! :) Naw, jking. :)</p>
<p>^ oh sorry...well you probably would have noticed at some point if your sheet was off</p>
<p>the ERA question was very early. so i doubt you went from, say, #20 to #90 without realizing you messed up osmehow</p>
<p>RAW = 90 - #omits - #wrong - .25*#wrong</p>
<p>hahajahja altindiegirl</p>
<p>does anyone remember what the choices were
for the LBJ question about how the opponents of him
wanted to restore power to state gov.?</p>
<p>Lols, I was just jking when I acted all mad. :) But eh? Who knows...I could see the argument for property taxes, but the answer is definitely not trade restrictions. Those were rarely enforced (salutary neglect, no?).</p>
<p>trade restriction was the answer?
omg i was like so happy for a second and now im so depressed again.</p>
<p>until when can we cancel?
im really considering cancelling...
seriously</p>