<p>Curves are really random so there is no telling, but I think it will be harsh.</p>
<p>@SAT
Corrections:</p>
<p>-The author mentions the * insert guys name here* is even better at social engineering to show… That his skills are diverse. Answer choice has diverse</p>
<p>Should be to show that human behavioral changes are needed. </p>
<p>-Author of passage 2 would say what about lines ???. The answer had something to do with strangers? Post if you can remember more on this question.</p>
<p>What does the author 2 think about the characterization of strangers in passage 1
Answer: IT is a good description of readers.</p>
<p>what was the one with half a century…also r u sure the private stranger was intrusion?</p>
<p>@drac the What does the author 2 think about the characterization of strangers in passage<br>
should be intrusion personal experience</p>
<p>@sat100, the one for the blogs and strangers was something like what was the strangers an example of and the answer was a typical blog reader</p>
<p>add more to the photography one ppl…what about that skeptic thing, and the galileo for clocks, etc.</p>
<p>I haven’t seen a good explanation of the SC answer “voluptuous.” The sentence mentioned the quality of the diction that the subject used, and there might have been a negative connotation. In that case I think the answer should be “pedantic,” meaning that he used high-class or showy diction in an academic way. Does anyone remember the question word-for-word? </p>
<p>Also, for the “cold-blooded” question I think the answer was heartless detachment. The author had just stated that his or her morale was high, and as a result he or she did not look negatively upon the idea of looking for a job. One who looked at the idea in cold blood (or in the opposite manner of the author, and therefore with heartless detachment) would be pessimistic about the idea.</p>
<p>@sat 100
one of the sections you put up the answers for has to be experimental do you know which one?</p>
<p>@everyone</p>
<p>Do you guys know which section was experimental? I’m really hoping for either the landlord (Alexander?) one or the photography one…</p>
<p>The experimental sections were the ones with the passages about The Andersons and Writing Novels.</p>
<p>i dont think so…andersons was correct.</p>
<p>i mean lol not correct…but it was real</p>
<p>Was the author Ambivalent or Contented? This question really bugged me to the point where I don’t even remember which of the two correct answers I put… On one hand the author was talking about being able to fight but not wanting to but being able to gain from the fight, that sounds pretty ambiguous. On the other hand the author’s morale was high, which sounds contented. Any consensus on which was correct?</p>
<p>@desi</p>
<p>how many cr sections did you have? and which ones do you remember?</p>
<p>Unless I’m forgetting something, I never had a passage about Anderson’s.</p>
<p>rdash, I’m pretty sure it was contented.</p>
<p>did anyone who didnt have the crit reading experimental not have one of these passages listed below </p>
<p>alexander(landlord)
biological clock
traffic control
photography
andersons (people with the house on an island)</p>
<p>i know that folgers was experimental. i asked a lot of people. cr was experimental for me.</p>
<p>@rdash
She is in high morale despite her lack of a job.
She has no animosity towards her overbearing landlords and is fine in the room she is in…she is contented with her situation.</p>
<p>ANDERSON’S IS EXPERIMENTAL : CONFIRMED!!!</p>
<p>OOO oops…nevermind ANDERSONS IS EXPERIMENTAL!!! sorry…i was thinking of the land rent or something.</p>