SAT January 2012 - Critical Reading

<p>was sophistry an answer?
what about contented?
prescient?</p>

<p>still dont understand the “quackery” question i really feel that humbuggery and elude could have been the answer. Should I argue it and hopefully get the question eliminated wow that would be amazing</p>

<p>I do not think sophistry was an answer.
Contented… I remember seeing it I don’t know if it was an answer.</p>

<p>cathartic also an answer and unique for Marie Curie</p>

<p>what did u all get for the question on photography when it asked what do all the authors think. I put something abt all people know abt socia change or somthing</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>It seems like this was an experimental, which sucks, I thought this was my best passage.</p>

<p>oh i think sophistry was an answer for the one about with elude but i think I changed my answer.</p>

<p>can everyone think of questions for the traffic passage? and the answer choices too? not just the answers? i want to check if i got them right.</p>

<p>one was about cars and cyclists sharing the same road</p>

<p>one was with simplistic, although i put something else.</p>

<p>^^^ yeah something about social or the world around them. Also the question that passage 2 would add would be distortion because the world-view was already represented in another question</p>

<p>I thought the passages were kind of difficult to understand but the traffic one was pretty easy.</p>

<p>Yeah I put “aloof and proud” for Mrs. Alexander</p>

<p>traffic was need to standardize not simplistic impossibility</p>

<p>Was it “make an assertion” or “hypothesis” for the circadian rhythm</p>

<p>What was that sentence completion question about the comment that was unsuitable for polite company? Or was this in the experimental section?</p>

<p>I didn’t know any of the vocabs other than questions 1 and 2…</p>

<p>For a question in the photography passage,</p>

<p>a question about the “possibility” in passage 2, and what represents it in Passage 1,</p>

<p>did you guys say the Cawkwell stories? or the expected effect of his soon to be published book (something along those lines)?</p>

<p>What was the question to the answer choice with (traffic laws) it being spontaneous or random examples</p>

<p>@almostsk8tr
i believe it was previous criticisms of his other books because some people didnt think it was true and were critical of them</p>

<p>the rest of you i have no idea what questions you guys are talking about</p>

<p>anyone complied a list yet? xD</p>

<p>@runallday
the traffic one can’t be experimental because my experimental was math and I still had the traffic one</p>