<p>drac can you compile a list please of the correct answers…also dont forget that voluptous was an answer for sentence completion. u got lack of agreed upon right for the traffic?</p>
<p>did u guys get something with “impeding” for the traffic one?</p>
<p>the cyclists were on the road with motorists</p>
<p>@zzzzzz
I remember that being the line reference. So that was the only one who went to a different field when they were good at what they did before.</p>
<p>@desi
Yes I got that (standardized)
I don’t know about the second q about the traffic passage, I am not sure what that question was</p>
<p>@hello
- instilled a groundbreaking law…I am not sure about which question you are asking
- share the road with motorists</p>
<p>what was the question for the volsuptuous question?!?!?</p>
<p>it was a sentence completion: like senses or luxurius diction or something like that</p>
<p>@hello</p>
<ol>
<li><p>I think I got interesting historical fact because I thought there weren’t enough evidence to support the statement that it was groundbreaking, but I may be wrong.</p></li>
<li><p>share the road with motorists</p></li>
</ol>
<p>and I got voluptuous for SC.</p>
<p>yah i got entertaining fact, too, and did u guys get qualify statement for galileo for the biological clocks</p>
<p>@Desi
I got explain an assertion or something like that on the bio clock one. The one right above qualify statement.</p>
<p>He is trying to explain his assertion by mentioning the legends he got them from I think, I put qualify and changed it since a legend’s main purpose isn’t to qualify a statement since it can be wrong. He wants to explain where he came up with his conclusions.</p>
<p>Yeah i got qualify a statement;</p>
<p>Ditto that feeling Nynja, only with my iPod!=P </p>
<p>Umm… Let’s see… Does anyone know the one about the public speaker? I put fluent and… Well, whatever else went with it. Evasive? I now think that answer choice was wrong. =P </p>
<p>Also, what was the one about the blogs? Criticising new technology? (criticism doesn’t HAVE to be negative) Or commenting on a contemporary practice? I forget which I put, to be honest. </p>
<p>As of yet, I think I’ve missed ~4.</p>
<p>@desigirl23</p>
<p>That question had me going for a while… but I eventually settled down on explaining an assertion.</p>
<p>That question was asking only about dashes. It is not groundbreaking it was the one about essential info. Remember, if it said dashes that’s all it wants so it is not talking about the sentence. So it is essential info to know that it is a legend. Fause it changes the complexion if the fact. Or it could have been a interesting fact…</p>
<p>r u sure? i thought it was saying something about --as legend is believed—</p>
<p>@Divy1234
Dashes? What? I don’t remember anything about that…</p>
<p>I’m sorry guys but I put humbuggery. One, quackery refers to a person and in the sentences case it was referring to the medicine. Next, the definition of quackery is one who relies on observation instead of scientifically proving anything. A quack is someONE who pretends to be medically learned.</p>
<p>Now for some other answers I got meticulous and aberrant, voluptuous, erudition and adroit, proud and aloof, foreshadowing, captivated by style</p>
<p>The passages I got were body clock photographer and traffic and nobody has mentioned nixon and kitchen debate do that was my experimental.</p>
<p>For the traffic passage and what the questions represent? I pt highlighting issues that need to be resolved</p>
<p>It’s the statement within the dashes does what or something. It wasn’t specifying the WHOLE sentence. Just the legend is believed part do anything that talks about the whole sentence is wrong.</p>
<p>Oh yea and for the humbug question it said stop aging not stall aging to elude (meaning escape) would be better than forestall</p>
<p>yah…same here…i thought it was qualify because to qualify is to make something less absolute…and i thought that it was only justified on the basis that legend is believed to be, but he is entirely not sure?</p>