<p>NishtDawg, I thought the 1st one was harder. The 2nd wasn't bad, I was wondering why there were 2 grid in sections when I practiced with only 1 in the blue book. Is the answer to that question about the president of a company after 9 terms: 1982? It said each term was 2 years long and he retired in 2000. So I figured that it was 2000-(9x2) which is 1982.</p>
<p>does anyone remember ANYTHING about the short passage about Mars and the water supply</p>
<p>each question dealt with both passages</p>
<p>i can only remember that i put that passage 2 refuted passage 1 and citing new information</p>
<p>and that other one was that human life wasn't sustainable in Mars (A)</p>
<p>any else? this is the section i think that really really screwed me over</p>
<p>no, it was 1983...it's not that simple unfortunately</p>
<p>one term is from jan 1999 to dec 2000</p>
<p>so as the pattern cont</p>
<p>jan 1997 to dec 1998</p>
<p>j 95, d 96</p>
<p>j 93, d 94</p>
<p>ultimately, nine terms ends with 1983</p>
<p>Well, when you shaded two inches of the shapes: the shaded part of the triangle became a trapezoid, the shaded part of the square was a rectangle, and the shaded part of the rectangle remained a rectangle. Starting to think I read it wrong though :(</p>
<p>yeah i put citing new information also.</p>
<p>the first passage about mars said that there was water and conditions were similar to earth. the second one said there were not carbonates found which means there was no water, and said that mars was always icy and cold. or somethingg like that.</p>
<p>Oh, I didn't have EITHER of those sections...Had two math grid-ins though...that explains a lot. Guess I got a different test?</p>
<p>i guess the collegeboard decided to make a kazillion tests!!!</p>
<p>Ok... I put that answer down</p>
<p>i also said citing new information.</p>
<p>how many questions in math can be wrong in order to still get a 700?</p>
<p>zpmqxonw, I thought when they moved it 2inches up everything above it was shaded</p>
<p>No, I'm sure the bottom part became shaded because I originally thought it was the triangle but then I saw the shaded part became a trapezoid. Everybody else seems to agree it was the triangle only though</p>
<p>P.S. I said citing new information also ;)</p>
<p>Omg that sux! Now, I think I got half the math section wrong, questioning why it seemed so easy. I didn't read it so detailed like you did though.</p>
<p>I really hope you're right Jpod.</p>
<p>Well, enough psychological mutilation for today. Bye</p>
<p>Well I am. I have extra time, so for whatever reason they decided not to give us the experimental section :)</p>
<p>i dont think i did too well now.. =(</p>
<p>did anyone have this order: (i thinnk this is what i had)</p>
<p>2- CR
3- math
4- math
5- CR
6- writing
7- writing
8- math
9- CR
10- writing</p>
<p>if this was the case, what would my experimental have been?</p>
<p>Jpod, are you typing to yourself? lol</p>
<p>anyone know how curves work?</p>
<p>btw i found the mars one the most difficult passage in the critical reading section; next was the reading one</p>
<p>i'm so sad. i missed so much on my math. x_x i've confirmed that i have 5 omits, and three wrong in math
i'm hoping my writing and cr score will help me tremendously.
darn i always depend on math, and math always disappoints me.</p>
<p>hey guys, do you remember this question:
this person is not in the camping team
which statement can explain whether or not she is in the hiking team</p>
<p>i chose (c): all people not in the camping team is not in the hiking team</p>
<p>no, i just dont understand how you quote on this site.</p>