Sat Reasoning June 06 - Post All Discussions HERE!

<p>why would you change one choice for another that means exactly the same thing.
I don't think I had that question though.</p>

<p>yea i did, it was easy after you read the choices, and no it didn't mean the same thing in the context</p>

<p>its more concise</p>

<p>^^I didn't take the test, but that sounds like it is passive and SAT people HATE passive voice (was + w/e).</p>

<p>no idea about what you guys are talking about</p>

<p>Yeah, but this passive is more of an adjective rather than one of those convoluted sentences that the SAT people indeed loathe.</p>

<p>it said "they widely read autobiographies" or something like that and they didnt refer to anyone mentioned previously so it had to be changed to was popular</p>

<p>I agree, but what was the question about. I font think I had that section.</p>

<p>I got this:</p>

<p>MULTIPLE CHOICE SCORE DETAIL<br>
Number Right: 45, Number Wrong: 4, Number Omitted: 0, Total Number of Questions: 49, Multiple-choice Raw Score: 44</p>

<p>With only 4 wrong and 0 admitted, how on earth did I get a raw score of 44? Was it just a really easy paper this year?</p>

<p>EDIT - PS please ignore. Just worked it out, bit slow today.</p>

<p>what about the one with the black man, which said he changed his view about slavery was it "was tolerated" or "put up with". I picked neither since they mean basically the same.</p>

<p>ugh I bombed writing, essay was terrible, probably 8, and missed at least 4 MC; that's okay, though, I got a 710 last time and W isn't very important. I thought the math was easy, but I always think it's easy, and have only gotten 720. CR idk...I was unsure on a lot, but from the looks of this thread i got a lot of them correct. already have a 700, so not too worried; i suck at CR.</p>

<p>i deleted for that one question, too.</p>

<p>Did anyone get 200 for the problem that had .03x and .04= 2. Something like that...</p>

<p>I put tolerated, but I wasn't sure still.</p>

<p>Did anyone have an experimental writing section(2 back to back)? Does anyone remember having a question like:</p>

<p>......she angered (or soemthing like that) some business or political people, or which whom many blacklisted her.</p>

<p>Or something like that?</p>

<p>The choices were all something to do with "of which whom," or ", of these many." I hope this was the experimental section for writing.</p>

<p>Yes Fitz, I got 200 for that one.</p>

<p>It was .04x - .03x = 2, so yes, it was 200 (or at least I fervently hope it was).</p>

<p>--For tmL's question, I think it was (A) - "many of whom" because none of the other proposed answers is as correct as that one.</p>

<p>For anyone who did not have a grid-in math experimental section
what type of grid in did you have
the ratio of 7 to 24 to 100 or one that had a parabola</p>

<p>Uh for the improving paragraphs or w/e, i deleted "however" since there was no contrast in the preceeding sentence(s)</p>

<p>Dammit that means the writing section I think I did a lot worse on was the real one :(</p>

<p>sorry for asking this but when do we get our scores?</p>

<p>YeS, its all comming back to me. The redbull is wearing off. N e ways, what did you all get for the question that said; x^2+y^2+z^2=9 or something</p>

<p>I got 5 I think</p>