<p>And I said the trust thing for the Egyptian question</p>
<p>Right so nomads and villagers was protection of trade routes or something i think?</p>
<p>I said they maintained a trading relationship with villages that was slightly rocky. I remember reading somewhere that they didn’t protect a lot of the trade routes and that they were mostly traders.</p>
<p>Alright so its still iffy, A third opinion would be great though.</p>
<p>I’ll just finalize the 88, then i’ll post</p>
<ol>
<li>Opposition to globalization/west: Afghanistan</li>
<li>Congo products: Rubber</li>
<li>Spread of Agri and Herding: SW asia something [Inconclusive]</li>
<li>Imperialism after ww1: Retained</li>
<li>Cathedral: Pilgrimage</li>
<li>Bhagavad Gita: Dharma</li>
<li>Wool Production: Flanders</li>
<li>Sikhism: Islam+Hindu</li>
<li>Spread of Hellenistic culture: East med</li>
<li>Slave soldiers: Janissaries</li>
<li>Mussolini v Stalin: Private Sector</li>
<li>L’ouverture, Franklin, Bolivar: Enlightenment</li>
<li>Caesaropapism: Secular and Church power in the czar</li>
<li>Enlightened despot: Frederick II/ the Great</li>
<li>Taj mahal:mausoleum</li>
<li>Shang bones: Oracle</li>
<li>Munich conference: appeasement</li>
<li>UN sec members: WW2 victors</li>
<li>Munich conference: resulted in continuation of hitler’s expansion </li>
<li>British Industrialization in the 1700’s and 1800’s: Working class growth</li>
<li>Boddhishatva: Englihtened dude</li>
<li>Muslim invasion in 7th century: Sassanids and Byzantines</li>
<li>Polynesian v American contact with Europe: Disease</li>
<li>Africans in India: Slave trade</li>
<li>Afro-Eurasian Trade: New World Crops</li>
<li>Oldest manuscript: Rig Veda</li>
<li>Cattle Ranching: Argentina, Mex, US SW</li>
<li>Japanese Emperors: Amaterasu/Sun God</li>
<li>Homer’s Map: Accurate source</li>
<li>Pastoral Nomads: Trade route protection/Trading relationships???</li>
<li>Egyptian dude and Pharaoh: Not yet resolved-Tasks given to low ranked ones/Trust???</li>
<li>Context of Egyptian dude: Afterlife</li>
<li>Daoism: To do nothing is to do everything</li>
<li>Ancient Math: Measurements and Calendars</li>
<li>Harappan Culture: Not deciphered</li>
<li>Rebel Hideouts: Runaway slaves</li>
<li>Coastal African Cities: Muslim Trade
38: Noble Savages: Taihitians</li>
<li>Athenian Voting: Male landowners</li>
<li>Mexican Nun: Political Patronage</li>
<li>Map of Indian Ocean: Trade existed before Europeans</li>
<li>Neolithic development: Diversification of Labor</li>
<li>Hamurrabi & Hebrews: Abuse of Law</li>
<li>Marco Polo: Mongol Protection</li>
<li>Redistribution of Lands: Equality</li>
<li>Nobles in Court of Louis XIV: To keep them busy & decrease power</li>
<li>Division of India: Muhammad Ali Jinnah</li>
<li>Austria-Hungary Problem: Nationalism</li>
<li>Barbarians: Ethnocentralism</li>
<li>Rome vs Han: Giving away of citizenship in Rome</li>
<li>Decolonization in Africa: Ongoing-Violent in places with whites/Dictatorship</li>
<li>Transfusion of culture: Europe was in the fringes</li>
<li>Ziggurats: Places of worship</li>
<li>Bandung Conference: Non-aligned countries</li>
<li>Bolivar’s Greatest Disappointment: No Grand Colombia/United South America</li>
<li>Mughal-Safavid Treaty Picture: Mughal superiority</li>
<li>Pseudo-Islamic Mali and Songhay: Traditional Religious Practices</li>
<li>The Traditional South American religion: Persisted under guise of Roman Catholicism</li>
<li>Scandinavian deaths: Wars and Trade in the South and East</li>
<li>Slaves in the Americas: Sugar Plantations</li>
<li>Repository of Hellenistic Culture: Alexandria</li>
<li>Marco Polo looking at the Black Pepper: Asia was full of riches</li>
<li>Christopher Columbus: East to India</li>
<li>Brazil ecological problems: Rain Forests</li>
<li>Mao Zedong and China’s economic collapse: cultural revolution and etc. </li>
<li>Printing Press: Song Dynasty</li>
<li>Christianity, Judaism, and Islam: Zoroastrianism</li>
<li>Vietnam: Confucianism and Buddhism </li>
<li>Huns, Mongols, and some other nomadic race was the horse</li>
<li>Mesoamerican food: maize</li>
<li>Young Turks: political reform</li>
<li>Boxer Rebellion: Europeans and Christians</li>
<li>Tokugawa/Japanese isolationism: Western influences</li>
<li>Opium war: Chinese Ports open for European Trade</li>
<li>New York, NY: Cape Town, South Africa</li>
<li>Atlantic Slave Trade: Port and Trade Cities on the Coast of Africa</li>
<li>Meiji restoration: Centralisation of Government</li>
<li>Massacres in the 1970s and 1990s: Cambodia and Rwanda</li>
<li>Political Ideology Reading: Enlightened Despotism</li>
<li>Mesoamerican opinion on Aztecs: Resentment</li>
<li>Cryllic Alphabet: Eastern Orthodoxy</li>
<li>African Society before 1000 C.E.: Not resolved</li>
<li>Mercantilism: Benefit of the mother country</li>
<li>Byzantine Empire: Eastern part of Roman Emp</li>
<li>Poland Alliance: To prevent soviet/german invasion</li>
<li>Berlin Conference: Division of Africa</li>
<li>Minister quote: Globalization</li>
<li>Confucianism: Ethics</li>
</ol>
<p>78/95 clinches 800
69/95 clinches 750
61/95 clinches 700</p>
<p>and this is a rather harsh curve, so all of us have room for around 26 errors if we want a 700 at least.</p>
<p>If you guys have something to add go ahead.</p>
<p>This is what Barron’s says, word for word. </p>
<p>“The relationship between nomadic futures and settled societies were mostly symbiotic, the nomads trading animals for goods produced in settled societies. When civilisations experienced disorder, so did the nomad. Nomads often became the carriers of long-distance trade. However, with disruption in trade, nomads could become raiders.” </p>
<p>I suppose the answer lies in how “carriers” is interpreted. As the Nomads protected the traders in return for a fee or the Nomads actually did the trading themselves.</p>
<p>Wow, that’s the definition of an iffy question right there. It maybe quite dependent on the pov</p>
<p>Did we ever figure out what the African Civilisation question was asking?</p>
<p>Nyet comrade. Apparently no one could remember</p>
<p>I’ll check back to make sure again though</p>
<p>Nah nobody ever found out.</p>
<p>all of the following are reasons for mayan collapse except aztec fighting right</p>
<p>I’m not sure. Do you remember the rest of the question?</p>
<p>I think it was factors not leading to maya decline, which I guess must be Aztec aggression or fighting, as they lived in a totally different time period.</p>
<p>Somehow I don’t remember the question at all… can you recall the choices?</p>
<p>“In Britain, his apparent betrayal at twice preventing the British attempt at joining the EEC was keenly felt for many years. That de Gaulle did not necessarily reflect mainstream French public opinion with his veto was suggested by the decisive majority of French people who voted in favour of British membership when the much more conciliatory Pompidou called a referendum on the matter in 1972. His early influence in setting the parameters of the EEC can still be seen today, most notably with the controversial Common Agricultural Policy.”
Charles de Gaulle - Why UK came late (1972) into the EEC</p>
<p>^89!!!</p>
<p>Almost there! Good thing I got that right!</p>
<p>Please if you guys remember anything, just post!!!</p>
<p>90) Former multiethnic states transforming into separate countries -> Sub-Sahara (South Sudan)</p>
<p>@ceboletta do you remember the other choices?</p>