<p>Lotte, I don't post either of my kids' academic "stats" on forums. Overall, I can say that my D was a very good student and had good SATs and SAT2's but none of her "stats" are stratospheric in the terms you mentioned. Selection to Tisch Scholars is not like a numbers game where the highest stats get chosen, or I doubt she'd have been selected. On the discussion forums, we often see kids posting stats when talking of who got in and who didn't (for any colleges). However, for selective colleges, while a student must have the requisite stats in the ballpark of admitted students to that college, once they do, MUCH more is considered. Some less selective schools might rely on numbers and cut offs but with more selective schools, a majority of applicants will have the numbers needed to get in so that is not what sets them apart. At selective schools, you will see kids who got in with an SAT or GPA or rank lower than some kid who was rejected, for instance. Both had stats in the right "range" for the school but much else came into play....essays, personal characterisitics, extracurriculars, achievements, recommendations to name a few. </p>
<p>For Tisch Scholars, the students are selected (I'll quote from parts of the letter) for "oustanding credentials as an applicant."....."Tisch University Scholars Program is an honors and leadership training program for emerging artists and scholars of the highest caliber."....."Incoming University Scholars are selected on the basis of academic and artistic excellence, as well as a demonstrated record of community service and leadership potential." I can't say why my D was selected and we didn't even know such a program existed until receiving the notification of selection. But I know it was not strictly based on stats as hers are surely NOT the highest of ALL applicants, though she had a strong academic record. In retrospect, once we read more about Tisch Scholars, it occurred to us that some of her essays really dovetailed with the kinds of students they were looking for because she described some activities she had done where she was a leader, initiator, and creator as well as service to her community in the arts. Tisch Scholars embodies that same kind of thing so I can see the fit there, though we had no idea at the time of application that such a program existed. There are about 15-18 Scholars chosen from all disciplines within Tisch. </p>
<p>Throughout the year, they participate in an enrichment program of special events, invited speakers, and discussions. Each scholar has to maintain a 3.5 GPA while in the program, and take on leadership roles in student activities and fulfill a community service requirement in the arts in the city each year. Each student participates in two trips fully funded by the program. The trips are cross-cultural encounters. As freshmen, Scholars travel to Appalshop which is in Appalachia in Kentucky, for workshops and creative projects with leaders in that arts community. Besides leadership skills, they explore issues of art, culture, and social change. (My D has led artistic activities in our community that were about social change as well so this really relates). In soph or junior year, each Scholar will go on an international trip with the group (this year was India, next year is Brazil, for example) and work with leaders in the arts there. Being in this program is a commitment. My D just returned from Kentucky last night and all I know so far was that it was a great experience and that the other kids in it became new friends. I hope to hear more today. My D also has an ongoing job in the city working in musical theater programs with youth. So, that is what Tisch Scholars is about. I think other schools at NYU have Scholars programs as well because my D's close friend from HS (my D graduated early after junior year and so her peers are currently in the senior class) just got selected as a Scholar at Stern. </p>
<p>Tisch Scholars is UNrelated to scholarships. No money is involved toward tuition or anything. However, all the trips and other yearly events are fully funded by the program. </p>
<p>The Trustee Scholarship, which we also had no idea that merit aid existed at NYU (that's why I share these things so others can find out about them as we knew nothing about this stuff when my D was an applicant), is about money toward tuition. The Trustee Scholarship was explained to me by someone in the financial aid office. I was told that it is a merit scholarship (you do NOT have to be an applicant for financial aid to receive one and I have seen posters post who got one who were not applying for aid). IF a student who receives a Trustee Scholarship is also a financial aid applicant (as my D was), then the scholarship amount may be higher as need comes into play after being selected for merit. </p>
<p>So, while I am not going to post stats of my children, I can tell you that they were in range for their universities but that other factors came into play for these sorts of selections. Again, I don't know why my kid was picked but she did have strong extracurriculars that were long time commitments, leadership, achievements/awards, good recs, essays that were well written and showed who she was as a person (she also excels at writing), and then there is the artistic talent part and I don't know how she was chosen in that respect. At the Scholars luncheon the Deans talked about their hopes that the students who were Scholars would be future leaders in some capacity in the arts. Leadership potential was a big factor, I believe. So, it is NOT ALL about stats. I'm sure you have to have good ones to be considered but it is not like they took the top stats off the pile in terms of admissions to the university, being selected as a Scholar, OR for the scholarships because I know my D's stats are quite good but not the highest at NYU by any means. That is another reason why posting stats is not that useful. I wouldn't for my kids' privacy anyway but I also see too many posts on other CC forums with merely stats and people analyzing who got in and who didn't and for selective schools, you can't tell by stats alone. Most applicants have the stats in the right ballpark for the college (or else really should not apply) and so lots else is going to be considered since too many students have the requisite stats. Admissions takes a wholistic view. They are accepting PEOPLE, after all. </p>
<p>Susan</p>