<p>What was the answer.......to that stupid question with the shaded square in the triangle...</p>
<p>The square was irrelevant, that's all I remember, you just calculated based on the side lengths of the large triangle.</p>
<p>i mean what was the area of the square, the second question with that figure</p>
<p>Hey i saw a crap load of debate on the prime number. It is 2 because all prime numbers after 2 is odd, otherwise it would be divisible by 2 (thus, not prime). A odd+odd is even, thus divisible by 2 (not prime). 2 is the only even number, and only even+odd = odd. 2+7 threw me off for a while too..</p>
<p>it took me forever to realize that the square was a distraction =.=</p>
<p>yeah i circled that problem because i was like: "AM I MISSING SOMETHING? WHAT IS THIS WITH SQUARE!!"</p>
<p>i think i spent the last 10 minutes i had on math just staring at that problem -_-</p>
<p>the last question for it, tan of <EaC or whatever was just 5/3 or something right?</p>
<p>wait a minute. The second question, it asked for the area of teh shaded area (the square) am i correct? The answer choices were like 10, 10.8, 11........? Any1 remember this?</p>
<p>it asked for something else. i don't remember any of the questions asking ANYTHING about the square.</p>
<p>am i wrong? (PLEASE DON'T BE .....;_; )</p>
<p>btw the answer i put for that question was 10.8 i believe</p>
<p>Hmmmmmmmm im pretty sure it was the square (that was teh shaded area right?) since i spent a good 5 minutes on it.......
The first question asked for slope, and third asked for tan. I'm almost certain the middle asked for perimeter or area of the square (now that i think about it, i think it was perimeter)</p>
<p>OH YEAHH 13.8 WAS MY ANSWER THEN JUST KIDDINGG. (legs of 3 and 5 and hypotenuse of 34^.5)</p>
<p>it asked for the perimeter of the triangle. i'm pretty sure, conidering how everyone else also said the square was a distractor. iderno though. anyone else?</p>
<p>Yes, it asked the perimeter of the triangle, not the area of the square.</p>
<p>I'm 85% sure there was nothing asked about the square's area.</p>
<p>eh thats understandable, since i sat there thinking that this was impossibe, there was no way to figure out the area/perimeter of the square. Damnit, 1 wrong. I hope i still get a 35 on math or 34</p>
<p>o are u sure AdamJaz i dont remember.. wat was the perimeter of the triangle,</p>
<p>Square had no impact on the problem whatsoever.
Yes it was 3, 5, root 34</p>
<p>Yeah, it was square root of 34, i remember that cuz i used the P theory or whatever.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the answer to the question that had like</p>
<p>A. No Change
B. around the area.
C. about the area.
d. about.</p>
<p>It was something like that haha</p>
<p>yeah, i do! It was "which of these would be the LEAST acceptable" and i think it was "c. about the area"</p>
<p>wdrmhbs-the question asked "which of the following would NOT be appropriate, and I'm pretty sure I said d.about, anyone else agree?</p>
<p>DJ - you can wander "about the area," but you cannot wander "about." right?</p>
<p>i think i put c about the area, but i would have to read the whole sentence.</p>