<p>What was the answer in the last story (i think) that said "and appetite OF...blah blah blah) and of was underlined. </p>
<p>Was the answer "for"?</p>
<p>it took me a while to understand that one but that’s what i got</p>
<p>yeah i got i put to initially but when i read it over it made sense to put for.</p>
<p>an appetite for self help books</p>
<p>Sorry, I mispelled the title lol. we can delete this one if it bothers anybody</p>
<p>It was for heh.</p>
<p>ACT English was really easy. I honestly think I got a perfect score or close to perfect.</p>
<p>1 question…the one about where does paragraph 4 belong? i said, where it is now…
it was in the passage about this lady working at a museum…discovering that the handicapped couldn’t appreciate…blah blah. am i correct?</p>
<p>Appetite for.</p>
<p>Opposed.</p>
<p>Make possible. </p>
<p>Helen keller. Irrelevant? </p>
<p>I also said to leave parapraph where it was (if you are referring to blindness/astronomy books passage)</p>
<p>for, and i think irrelavent on HK, and i dont remember the other ones</p>
<p>i said paragraph should be moved to after paragraph 5. She draws the pictures and then lets the students test it out and offer suggestions.</p>
<p>Helen Keller distracted from the focus of the paragraph.</p>
<p>appetite for</p>
<p>Are you sure the question about moving the paragraph was paragraph 5?</p>
<p>If you looked at the paragraph carefully it mentions “these illustrations,” which needs a clear antecedent. The only paragraph which clarified this was paragraph 2…</p>
<p>What was paragraph 2 about, and paragraph 5 about? I think i put after paragraph 2 as well, but can’t think of it clearly</p>
<p>I think i put after paragraph 2 also</p>
<p>No, in paragraph 2, she writes w/out illustrations. But in the sceond book, she draws pics from hubble space telescope after a scientist suggests it to her. So it would be fitting for the blind students to test that book out rather than the first book. So the paragraph should go after para. 5</p>
<p>How can the kids test illustrations that haven’t been drawn?</p>
<p>That’s the problem with moving to para 5.</p>
<p>She had an early version of the book called Touching the Stars, and a scientist suggested that she make a better version. So she sat down at the table, made a new book, etc. Then she asked all the people what they thought.</p>
<p>what did you guys write for would of craned (about train)
would of is improper english…</p>
<p>i think i put “would crane”</p>
<p>me too
10 char</p>
<p>for the Helen Keller question, i said it distracted, not the other choice because Helen Keller is blind which relates to the rest of the passage.</p>
<p>and about the paragraph being moved, i said keep it where it is.</p>