<p>I will pose my question first. </p>
<p>To the readers of the books,
how did the movie compare. what aspects of the movie were enhanced because you've been reading the books, was the movie blasphemy? anything else, comments...., and how did you like the movie?</p>
<p>To the passersby
how was the movie? what did you like, not like, comments....yadayada, how did you like it?</p>
<p>To the readers who object to see becaues of blaspemy
Why? Explain yourselfs</p>
<p>Anyone else
Please comment</p>
<p>So i saw the movie about two weeks ago. I've read about half of all the sherlock tales sir arthur conan doyle produced, and i do love the series. but when i saw robert downey jr was going to be holmes i was ****ed. and when i realized that his task was to save the world i was also nonplussed. but after realizing that movies must be made in such a way to get the dough at the box office, i put this bias behind me (do we ever put biases and prejudices behind us?)</p>
<p>So onto the movie</p>
<p>I loved how they (although seldom) referenced the other books while engaged in conversation. I did enjoy that. I was a little upset about how they "urbanized" his deduction skills with fast cameras and faster camera angles, but what can you do? (shrugs shoulders) The ephasizing of illegal boxer was too much. They should have emphasized his morphine addiction, ha!</p>
<p>I did not care for the action at all. I'm a drama and suspense guy. The oldies are dear to my heart but all the action was to much for me and messed up my pacemaker (jk).</p>
<p>One thing which puzzled me is that the audience could not understand the british dialect (not figuratively, they couldnt understand it!!) I love old british sit coms so i have a leg up, but around the comedic sections, the majority did not laugh at the jokes because they couldnt understand what was being said.</p>
<p>Rant over. its your turn</p>