<p>First tier schools you need mid 700 +-. Anything below 700 is a red flag.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Yes, a high II will make up for a low I, most certainly.
I have a friend who scored 600 on I, but 720 on II.
Which is still pitifully low, but acceptable.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Eff you. Seriously, I want to hit you on the head with a shovel or something.</p>
<p>^It's really funny cause I was thinking the same thing...</p>
<p>I think that unless you're going to do AMAZINGLY better its not worth it
It actually looks worse if you retake it and only do like 50 points better....
you have 690 right? unless you hit above like 750....don't do it
take level II.....rnt u taking pre-calc in school soon?</p>
<p>
[quote]
First tier schools you need mid 700 +-. Anything below 700 is a red flag.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>A first tier school admitted me, and I had a 690 in U.S. History.
The difference between 700 and 690 is one question: negligible.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Eff you. Seriously, I want to hit you on the head with a shovel or something.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>BAAAAAW!
I had a 650 in Math II--does that make you feel better?
Don't let your angst out on me just because you can't do Pre Calculus.
The reality of the situation is that many people who apply to top national universities have 800s in Math II. A low score on this test, depending on how one defines low, can only serve to hurt an applicant. My score has hurt me, I know that for sure.</p>
<p>KWU, you gave me some hope. I am gonna try for a 750 on this test using PR and Rusen Meylani 15 practice sat math 1 tests.</p>
<p>Good luck. You can do it.</p>