<p>Ok, so I did very well on my SAT I for both reading and writing. I was planning to take literature SAT II, but after finding out my SAT I score, I thought that I had already shown I was good at English. So I took chem instead. But now that I look at it, I have all math/science SAT IIs... I did very well, but do you think I should take a humanities to show that I'm also good in that field, or will my SAT I scores say that already?</p>
<p>bump?</p>
<p>I feel the urge to bump...</p>
<p>if you already have all the required number, taking more would just seem obesessive, especially since you already have good scores</p>
<p>Well, I have the requirements, but I've seen maybe most people take at least one in humanities. I did well on the tests, but all three were math/science. At the time, I thought "I did great on CR and W, so I can focus on math/science on SAT II."</p>
<p>But now, should I take another one in Lit or History?</p>
<p>SAT II history (U.S. or WH) is easier than Lit.</p>
<p>I'd say US is the easiest, then comes World because of the sheer breadth of it (its not easy task to know 4,000,000 years of Human history across Earth) and then Literature is the hardest because its just CR on the SAT but x1000. </p>
<p>(Coming from a person who got a 800 on WH)</p>
<p>Lit is HARD. I have 800 CR and 680 Lit -_-</p>
<p>lit isn't as bad as these people make it seem.</p>
<p>I have 680 CR and 740 lit.</p>