<p>Don't get me wrong. I am immensely dissatisfied with the educational establishment in Korea and even the US too. The Korean obsession with the Ivy League is disturbing.</p>
<p>Despite the flood of top echelon Asian students to overseas schools, innovation and breakthrough are slow in coming.</p>
<p>The problem I suppose, is that after being pounded all the way through primary and secondary school on how meritocratic the Singaporean system is, you realise, meritocracy is a sham. Perhaps the sting is in disillusionment.</p>
<p>Admission isn't contingent on income, but there is a high correlation...</p>
<p>
[quote]
scholarships are common so most independent school students don't need to pay restrictively high fees.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Ehhh .... at ACSI you got your 12-dollar / month tuition only if you were GEP / MEP.</p>
<p>My 10k / month remark btw, was more of a rhetorical point. Even at 5k to 7k you're hovering around the 75th percentile. </p>
<p>The "good school" characterisation is also problematic. The formative years of primary school are the most important ones -- but they're also the ones that are the cheapest to influence. Is there anything "bad" about a neighbourhood school? I went to Fairfield Primary, which is a government-aided institution but hovers somewhere around the middle. The atmosphere and climate there (and at its successor FMSS) is much warmer than at ACSI, and surprise, most of my good Singaporean friends that I've kept contact with hail from my primary school than my secondary school.</p>
<p>Many rich parents it seems, can't stand the thought of their child attending any other school (at the primary level) but the "top". But with all that high tuition, how much does it matter? And why are so many unwilling to say, use those resources they are willing to pay to <em>create</em> excellence (e.g. through parent-funded coalitions and programmes), rather than be enslaved by the establishment's conception of it?</p>
<p>Anyway, you are someone I would like to meet :) </p>
<p>Don't worry, I am not against high-income per se (I am a libertarian), or condo/bungalow-dwellers, etc. It's just that the wants frequently correlated with individuals with such traits are often mindless, but the don't have to be (which is what I'm getting at.)</p>