<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not bashing them, nor their professions. And I give way more on my own job in education than most of my peers do. I know about overcommitment. The difference is, when I did need to make the sacrifices (job-wise) at critical times in my children’s lives, I did so, because it was my parental responsibility to do so **if I wanted the results that I wanted <a href=“and%20got”>/b</a>. Now, if I hadn’t been particularly invested in family results, I could have continued to give to the community in substitute for giving to my family. The problem was, the community could never do for my children what I could do, and did do. We’re talking about choices and consequences here. You’re fine with your family’s choices & consequences, and no one should question that, as long as you (or anyone here) does not believe that the college admissions system should change to accommodate to one’s own family priorities, if those are different from the college’s priorities.</p>
<p>I think you misunderstood me about sports, and obviously I was unclear. I meant: the only direct substitute of sports for academics is in recruiting situations. In that case, a Dad would be doing double-duty efficiently, but as you know equally with me, very few even quite-accomplished athletes are admitted with poor grades but highly-compensating sports as a hook. Those are the more extreme exceptions. Hope that’s clear now.</p>