103-" but it sounds like you don't even know what his feelings are or if he actually tried to join and was rejected."
“I do know. I’m friends with his dad. He went through the process and was not accepted by any fraternity.”
__
But you should find that a good thing, since you don’t think fraternities have any value. I think it is very rare not to be asked to be in any fraternity, and I bet he turned down some houses as not being right for him, and was then rejected by some houses who found him not a match for them. He gets to be picky but they don’t? At a school the size of Syracuse, if he’s sitting alone it is because he’s chosen not to join things. He wanted one thing, didn’t get it, chose to be a loner.
I’m very much of the belief that all kids should be invited to be part of the girl scout troop, the birthday party, the basketball team in third grade, but there comes a time when socially you have to adjust to groups you want to join and everyone doesn’t get a trophy for playing, and doesn’t get a social invitation just for breathing. Is it sad to see a kid hurting and excluded? Yes, but should everyone not get to have a group of friends because one kid just can’t fit in? If you’d posted that they didn’t even give this kid a chance at a fraternity, didn’t even let him go through rush, then I’d agree that they were just a bunch of meanies. They did give him a chance and just decided he didn’t fit in to the group. My kids have friends that are just strange or have special needs and while my kids will do something separate with these old friends (usually kids of my friends, or friends they met because of a shared experience from their youth), my kids aren’t going to stay home from a concert or not join the team or sorority because the old friends have nothing in common socially with the new group of friends and weren’t invited to participate.
You also claim that 20 year olds aren’t qualified to chose their friends and future roommates and who they will hang out with for 4 years. Really, then who is? Everyone judges and decides who they want to be friends with, whether it is a formal decision like Rush or an informal one, like ‘hey, do you want to be roommates?’ Admins for the university look at the stats and give a thumbs up or down, often without meeting the person, getting to know him, finding out that he’s mean, racist, filthy, negative, or a deadbeat, because admissions decisions are often made based just on a written application. During Rush, the existing members look at the applications, talk to those wanting to get in, find out if they have things in common and what the potential member can add to the group. Of course there are judgments about the applicant, but those judgments are made by admins too, and by employers, co-op housing boards, country clubs, civic groups and others throughout life. Is it really so hard to see that admins are making a judgment that this applicant with a 3.5/2000 SAT is good for the school and a sorority looking at an applicant and deciding this girl with a 3.5 and a girl scout gold award, who was a cheerleader, president of her drama club, who likes dancing and has a recommendation from 2 alums would be a good fit for this sorority? Or the admin who decides the kid with a 3.5/ 1950 just isn’t good enough for the school so rejects her, and the sorority who found the Rushee arrogant and messy and loud and, despite the 2 recommendations, rejects her?
I’ve worked in a lot of places where I wish the employers had judged the applicants a little more on the social interactions of the office and a little less on the stats to determined who got the job. If I have to spend 40 hours a week with someone, I want to like him.