<p>For people who've used Sparknotes and taken the test, how well did your scores correlate? Also, did you find Sparknotes harder/easier/about the same difficulty as the real thing?</p>
<p>I just got an 790 on it (3 Wrong, 5 Blank), and all 3 of my errors were in the first 10 questions (lol, all of them stupid mistakes too). I'm hoping this means I'm pretty prepared for the test.</p>
<p>If it helps, my other scores on other tests are:</p>
<p>Barron's Diagnostic = 700
PR = 630 (!!) and 740
CB Book = 740</p>
<p>its so hard to tell with math tests..i've scored 780 and770 on sparknotes and then 740 on CB and 760 on CB. Of course the CB is the one to look at but then again, the questions can be so different from test to test.</p>
<p>For the June test Sparknotes was WAY too easy to be an accurate estimate. I got an 800 on sparknotes, but I was also getting high 700's - 800 on barron's too. It may have just been the stress/pressure of test-day, but the actual thing felt a lot closer to barrons than sparknotes. You should be ok though... the curve on math2 is so rediculous that 750+ is pretty much a given</p>
<p>Dunno why but I find the sparknotes test slightly more difficult in terms of time management; the questions are not that difficult to solve but seem more time consuming than those from CB... I tend to be getting 760 - 780 on sparknotes because I don't make it to the last 3-4 questions. On the official CB practice test, I got an 800 with a reserve of one mistake...</p>
I got 800 on Math 2 in June and it seemed to me not a lot more difficult than Sparknotes - but not as hard as Barron's.
If I remember it right, deviation question was outside of Sparknotes' scope.</p>
<p>My 780 on Math 1 was consistent with my Sparknotes scores - I almost always manage to let a couple of stupid mistakes creep in. :(</p>