<p>I think you are expecting more than even a financially sophisticated teenager can pull off.</p>
<p>Yes, we had budgets. We did not tell the kids, " we ran the numbers, here’s where they shake out, go figure out an application strategy that makes sense". We encouraged the kids to come up with a broad list of schools that met their academic needs and social preferences, in the “right” location (one needed urban, one didn’t care, etc.) We then helped them evaluate each school- what would the likely net cost be, would it be “worth” the family contribution, what “sweat equity” would be involved by the kid in order to make it happen (travel expenses for the far away schools, etc) and then assessed the likelihood of admissions.</p>
<p>That cut the lists to a manageable number. There were schools the kids were interested in which after evaluating “worth”, they cut willingly. (Why fly 3,000 miles to attend a college which wasn’t as good a fit academically as one 125 miles away, or one accessible by public transportation). There were schools the kids cut reluctantly (they agreed that the overall experience might not be “worth it” but there was an intangible that attracted them).</p>
<p>But we did not need to do any cutting ourselves- it was a collaborative effort where we collectively figured out what each kid needed and wanted in a college education.</p>
<p>I don’t know any kid who can stare at the Fiske guide of 3,000’s of schools, take the general parental guideline “here’s our budget” and figure out which 6 or 8 schools go on the list, and which do not. And truth be told, there are schools which are technically affordable (as in, they come in under your budget)which are not a good educational “value” in the sense that your kid needs to spend four years living there and hopefully emerge with a solid college education. In many instances, kids need a parents perspective to see that even if something is affordable monetarily, the opportunity cost of spending your college years in a place that isn’t a good fit, more than outweighs the “savings”.</p>
<p>That’s where you come in.</p>
<p>We know kids who end up at our local state college (not the flagship; you can live at home and take the bus) which has very narrow majors available. Every year we know kids who end up there who shouldn’t be there… a kid who is a strong engineering candidate (this branch of the state college does not have an engineering school) but who ended up with a bunch of unaffordable acceptances. The kid who has mastered five languages by the end of HS and wants to major in linguistics and computer science (this school has neither… they do have a two year programming sequence, which the strong CS type student has already self-taught him or herself.) Etc.</p>
<p>Don’t let this be your kid. If the local option is an appropriate academic option, and affordable, it belongs on the list. If it doesn’t have any of the programs or departments that your kid wants to study, than even if it’s affordable, take it off the list. You’re not saving any money if your kid needs to transfer after two years because she’s exhausted the courses that she wants to take.</p>
<p>If you post your D’s stats and what her interests are and some general financial constraints, I bet the wisdom of this crowd could add a few affordable options to your D’s list.</p>