@Newdle It depends on what question you’re answering. Keep in mind that #6 is probably meant for extenuating circumstances that affect how you’re able to work (family responsibilities, needing to have a job, huge commute time, etc) to make sure that each bit of your application is seen in the appropriate context. For example, it’d be unfair to fault someone who has to leave right after school to pick up his little siblings for not having a huge amount of ECs. If you don’t have something that you honestly think needs clarification (which is okay if you don’t!) don’t waste time writing it.
That being said, if you need more words to fully explain your situation, take them. It’d be better for SSP to understand where you’re coming from then to give them a fragmented picture of what you’ve dealt with. Be concise.
7 can also probably be short answer, depending on what you need to discuss. There is no right answer when SSP is asking you to explain any circumstances that may affect your ability to work.
I would hope that #8 would also be short answer…if not, I am both disturbed and intrigued.
@kkpanu9 I am of the school of thought that believes if you have a chance to do something and the time to get it done, you should do it. The essays aren’t that long (if you think they’re rough, get ready for college apps!) and once you get everything together, just send it in. You’ll have a few months to think about it (or not) and then you’ll hear back. Don’t get in? Fine, you spent a little bit more time writing essays that you’ll probably end up using for other programs/activities or modeling your college essays on. Think about your possibilities. If you don’t get in, you’ll do something else (which you’ll probably enjoy just as much as you would SSP). If you do and can’t go, you get a trip to India and some leverage to guilt your parents into buying you a new telescope or something. And if you do go? As you can probably surmise from the posts here and on the website, you will have a truly incredible summer.
@alzhao Probably just high school, unless your question refers to the “legal disciplinary action” part. Once again, disturbed and intrigued.
@EveningSwan Give it to the teacher who sees your passion the most.
I had my AP Chemistry teacher write me my recommendation because I despised my physics class/teacher and I loved AP Chem. Though I did well in both classes, I genuinely enjoyed being in AP Chem, and my excitement was obvious to my teacher. It’s better for SSP to see that you can be enchanted by a subject (even if its not in the field that you want to pursue for a career).
Because neither physics nor calculus is required, I don’t think they give preference to letters from teachers of those subjects.
NOTE: In some cases it can be good to submit a letter from a class that you don’t do well in. An adcom at some admissions event I went to said it the best: “it is far more interesting to hear from the math teacher who gave you a B than from the English teacher who gave you an A.” Not because math is better/worse, but having a teacher in a class you struggled with vouch for how hard you worked can explain the grade better and will show that you take your “failures” in stride. I wouldn’t necessarily go that route for SSP admissions, but you may consider it when February updates come around for you guys (in a year! Wow, I am an old) and you might want to submit an additional letter of rec if possible.