<p>Is admission easier for Tepper ED or NYU Stern ED? How about RD?</p>
<p>I looked at the common data set and I noticed that ED to Tepper is quite beneficial? Am I looking at the wrong data, or am I right?</p>
<p>CMU is more of an early decision whore so an ED thrown to Tepper would be easier as it would affect the admissions process more.</p>
<p>NYU doesn't really care too much about who ED's or not.</p>
<p>Following what AtCA said, I remember a CMU rep telling me the diff between ED and RD is 50% to 30% chance. Me thinks they reaallly like their EDs.</p>
<p>Cornell, Upenn, Carnegie Mellon, Princeton, WUSTL, etc are really known as ED whores. These schools feel the need to protect their yield (especially WUSTL) from their peers (though Princeton shouldn't have much to fear).</p>
<p>I really don't think any school can be particularly considered an ED whore because all colleges like a high yield. Harvard, Yale, and Stanford fill slightly under half of the entering class with EA admits, for example.</p>
<p>Well I name them such because an ED to these schools will BOOST your chances while an ED at say, UVA or Harvard, won't really help you as much. </p>
<p>WUSTL has been known to accept way lower-caliber of students from its ED pool and then waitlist 4.0's and 2400s in regular decision. If that is not ED whoring then I dunno what is.</p>
<p>So Tepper's ED pool would have what kind of stats as opposed to their RD pool? I know I can't make it to Stern, but I really want to go somewhere good for business.. CMU would be quite ideal :)</p>
<p>Perhaps .1 less in GPA and 100 less points on SAT.</p>