<p>Actually I can judge any institution. Seriously it really is a bad school. Just look up it's average SAT, etc. It's pitiful. I don't think it's worth the money/time. Sorry just because I'm white doesn't mean I can't state the obvious.</p>
<p>Youre right Hoo.... it is a really bad school and no one good comes out of it. It definitely is not worth the time and money.....Keep on judging !!!</p>
<p>In case you couldn't tell I was being facetious...I am an alum of Clark and I can say with much confidence it is not trash nor should you be calling any school trash. </p>
<p>I'm not going to give you a resume but from my personal experience I got into every graduate program I applied to (Tufts, BU, Vandy, UNC, Howard, NYU, and PSU).</p>
<p>Also many other alums from my class are going on to extraordinary programs at NIH, MIT, Emory, Havard, UCLA, and UMich.</p>
<p>BTW, I did horrible on the SAT's does it mean I'm trash or my school is trash??? No.</p>
<p>Again, do not judge Clark.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>very true. especially since sat scores are the only way of judging the intelligence and potential of college students and how succesful they will be in life.</p>
<p>"very true. especially since sat scores are the only way of judging the intelligence and potential of college students and how succesful they will be in life."</p>
<p>? Are you kidding?</p>
<p>I think it's called sarcasm.</p>
<p>One would hope... but I've read posts in other threads that demand that SAT scores and grades be the ONLY critreria for college admission. These are the same people who beleive that anyone who does not score as high as them is "less qualified". Do people who hold these beliefs extend that same rationale to post-collegiate life? I assume that they do, but I could be wrong.</p>
<p>No they don't they call them clients or patients. It all works out. Just kidding.</p>
<p>Very funny... :-)</p>
<p>and yes it is sarcasm.</p>