The C Student from Andover & Yale!

College Confidential Community
101

<p>Bennett - 'Aborting All
Black Babies Would
Reduce Crime'
9-30-5</p>

<p>WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Congressional Democrats blasted former Education Secretary William Bennett on Thursday for saying that aborting "every black baby in this country" would reduce the crime rate, and demanded their Republican counterparts do the same. </p>

<p>"This is precisely the kind of insensitive, hurtful and ignorant rhetoric that Americans have grown tired of," said Rep. Bobby Rush, D-Illinois. </p>

<p>Bennett, who held prominent posts in the administrations of former presidents Ronald Reagan and George Bush, told a caller to his syndicated radio talk show Wednesday: "If you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose -- you could abort every black baby in this country and your crime rate would go down.</p>

102

<p>GreenDayFan: No offence, but you are not an intelligent individual.</p>

103

<p>Sweet, physics 911 is SO unbiased /sarcasm. Just because it goes against the official story, its suddenly "unbiased"? Honestly, you are now just making stuff up for the sake of making stuff up. Settle down, you are fooling yourself.</p>

<p>Oh and hardstyle, how can you accuse me of liking fascism, when you support islamo-fascist terrorist governments. What, you think sharia law is not fascist? LOL. Oh yes, and you posted that article in three threads, so here is my response to you copy and pasted from the other one.</p>

<p>Your article has nothing to do with the issue being discussed. Now third of all:</p>

<p><em>disclaimer</em> I am completely against aborting every black baby, and I have nothign against black people, white people, asians, and anyone else.</p>

<p>The context in which he said would make him absolutely correct. It is well known that statistically, blacks have much higher crime rates. Now, he doesn't advocate doing such a heinous act as aborting a baby just because they are of a certain race. He simply said it hypothetically, and in that context, he would actually be correct. He never advised for anyone to do so. What he said was equivalent to a "what if...." question.</p>

<p>
[quote]

"On Thursday, Bennett, author of "The Book of Virtues," told FOX News that his remarks were to be viewed from the specter of academia and philosophic argument.</p>

<p>"To put forward a hypothesis, a morally impossible hypothesis, to show why it is morally impossible and reprehensible, seems to me is a standard way of talking about public policy and a standard way of teaching," he said."

[/quote]
</p>

<p>So like hardstyle to take words out of context. Even more like hardstyle...posting a COMPLETELY irrelevant article to the debate.</p>

104

<p>Only The Passionate Conservative DaTurtle would justify this statement by the Fat Gambling Addicted Moral Beacon William "Ten Gallon Head" Bennett. Then again, Ariel Sharon aborts Palestinian babies with his bombs & Uzi Automatic weapons everyday. Eretz Yisrael!</p>

<p>Bennett's Newest Virtue -
Abort All Black Babies
By Judith Moriarty
<a href="mailto:noahshouse@adelphia.net">noahshouse@adelphia.net</a>
9-30-5</p>

<p>Bill Bennett - author of (gag) The Book of Virtues - former Secretary of Education, former Drug Czar. </p>

<p>Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan Administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crimeif that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down". Bennett conceded that aborting all African - American babies "would be an impossible ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do", then added, "but the crime rate would go down". </p>

<p>And people wonder at the criminal negligence; that left people to die in the Superdome - Convention Center and on I-10 (the sick- elderly- infirm) and in the Charity hospitals. This sort of sums up the real mind set of these phonies. Gosh but what would we do, with all the white collar corporate/political criminals practicing genocide - environmental holocausts - and thievery (pension funds - stock manipulations - no -bid contracts - tax subsidies - off shore banking - loophole legislation ) or the serial killers like Dahmer - Bundy (once a member in good standing of the Young Republicans) , John Gacy, Charlie Manson etc. Sad thing is, Bennett just voices - what a lot of people; posing as such tolerant - unbiased people, really feel (let's get real) - the true test being to note the level of their "tolerance" when it's announced that a minority housing development will be built in their gated enclaves - resort areas - or Currier and Ives postcard towns. </p>

<p>I rest my case.</p>

105

<p>
[quote]
Only The Passionate Conservative DaTurtle would justify this statement by the Fat Gambling Addicted Moral Beacon William "Ten Gallon Head" Bennett. Then again, Ariel Sharon aborts Palestinian babies with his bombs & Uzi Automatic weapons everyday. Eretz Yisrael!

[/quote]

^Wow aren't we full of biased hatred. I wasn't trying to justify it, it was a foolish comment. I was explaining what he meant.

[quote]

Bennett's Newest Virtue -
Abort All Black Babies
By Judith Moriarty
<a href="mailto:noahshouse@adelphia.net">noahshouse@adelphia.net</a>
9-30-5</p>

<p>Bill Bennett - author of (gag) The Book of Virtues - former Secretary of Education, former Drug Czar.</p>

<p>Addressing a caller's suggestion that the "lost revenue from the people who have been aborted in the last 30 years" would be enough to preserve Social Security's solvency, radio host and former Reagan Administration Secretary of Education Bill Bennett dismissed such "far reaching, extensive extrapolations" by declaring that if "you wanted to reduce crimeif that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down". Bennett conceded that aborting all African - American babies "would be an impossible ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do", then added, "but the crime rate would go down".

[/quote]

Did you miss that parrt? Once again, it is true that the crime rate would go down since statistically blacks and mexicans have a higher crime rate. He meant it hypothetically.

[quote]

And people wonder at the criminal negligence; that left people to die in the Superdome - Convention Center and on I-10 (the sick- elderly- infirm) and in the Charity hospitals. This sort of sums up the real mind set of these phonies. Gosh but what would we do, with all the white collar corporate/political criminals practicing genocide - environmental holocausts - and thievery (pension funds - stock manipulations - no -bid contracts - tax subsidies - off shore banking - loophole legislation ) or the serial killers like Dahmer - Bundy (once a member in good standing of the Young Republicans) , John Gacy, Charlie Manson etc. Sad thing is, Bennett just voices - what a lot of people; posing as such tolerant - unbiased people, really feel (let's get real) - the true test being to note the level of their "tolerance" when it's announced that a minority housing development will be built in their gated enclaves - resort areas - or Currier and Ives postcard towns.

[/quote]
^^ What IS this crap that you just posted? What the hell...!?!??! How is this even related to his comment?!?!? That was the most ludicrous, biased, and off-topic thing I have seen in a while. You are bordering on the paranoid/insane.</p>

<p>And damn, if you want to blame someone, blame Ray Nagin for his criminal negligence. It was the HE who didn't allow FEMA to step in early enough. He mismanaged relief efforts. Or how about blame htose that had the ability to move out of NO, but chose to stay on their own accord? Lets not blame anyone! Lets follow the liberal doctorine of "let the government pamper us and give us our social security checks". Lets only blame the government for our own shortcomins! How childish, immature, and pathetic.</p>

<p>
[quote]
I rest my case.

[/quote]
What case, the only thing that you posted (except for that second paragraph ABSOLUTE DRiVEL) is that Bennet said something about aborting black babies.</p>

106

<p>Turtle, you never cease to amaze me. It's your arcane mentallity and those that share it, that keeps this Country from moving forward in terms of it's humanity. It must be clocked in your genetic make-up to connect so intimately with those responsible for heinous crimes and acts against humanity. It's obvious that your views about minorities are grounded in stereotypes and hatred. No surprise though because you support the likes of Ariel Sharon & The Dummy George Bush, two world leaders devoid of morality and human values. Everyone agrees that FEMA was horrendous in their response to Katrina especially since they have the resources of the Federal Government. But Turtle can't resist blaming the Mayor because he's a black man in charge of an Impoverished City with little resources to handle such a disaster. Thank God more & more Americans have distanced themselves from your kind of hateful & biased Ilk.</p>

<p>The more corrupt & devious a leader is, the more Daturtle loves & supports him. It must be tough holding on to such deep seated hatred & bias Turtle. Why are you like this, did your girlfriend leave you for a black guy? ***** Envy? Fear? Take some vitamins and get some rest and you'll perform better in the sack! You don't have to hate people that aren't apart of your little manicured false world.</p>

107

<p>Quarter of a Million Dollars Per Settler </p>

<p>by Charley Reese
The state of Israel – which, the last time I checked, was both a foreign and a sovereign nation – wants the American taxpayers to cough up $2.2 billion in addition to our regular $3 billion-or-so annual subsidy to pay for the withdrawal from Gaza.</p>

<p>Unless the American people raise hell about this, it's a done deal. In Washington, whatever Israel wants, Israel gets. Nevertheless, there are several reasons why the American people should rebel at the latest brazen attack on our treasury by Israel and its American supporters.</p>

<p>First, Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon decided unilaterally to withdraw from Gaza. This was in lieu of following the president's peace plan, which Sharon has ignored from the very beginning. Where is it written, on stone or parchment or paper, that the head of a foreign government can decide to do something unilaterally and automatically send the bill to the American taxpayers? We will derive no benefits at all from the withdrawal.</p>

<p>Furthermore, Sharon's adviser spilled the beans in an Israeli newspaper interview. The withdrawal from Gaza is not part of any peace plan. It was just an excuse to put off serious peace negotiations. Sharon will remove about 8,000 settlers from Gaza who are a pain in the government's rear end anyway, shut down four tiny settlements on the West Bank, and that's it. As Sharon's adviser admitted, there won't be any serious negotiations with the Palestinians until they "turn into Finns."</p>

<p>A normal president would view Sharon's actions as unacceptable and his casual expectation that we would pay for it as a personal insult. President George Bush, however, when it comes to Israel, is just like Congress – a candy-bottom. That's why, despite all of our problems, all of our deficits, all of our debts, the U.S. government has gifted Israel with more than $90 billion in recent decades. If Washington gives in, we taxpayers will be spending about $227,000 per Jewish settler. That's a sporty moving expense.</p>

108

<p><a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/War_Israel_1967.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://judicial-inc.biz/War_Israel_1967.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

109

<p>You posted that crap in two threads. I'm copying my response from the other one.</p>

<p>Response:
HAHA YOU ARE AN UTTER SHEEP!!? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_Arab-Israeli_War%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1967_Arab-Israeli_War&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Can you remind me how it was a war of aggression? Should I remind you of Nasser's troops moving in to provoke Jerusalem? You are a tool. Congratulations.</p>

<p><a href="http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?io8bx114yivc%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://artpad.art.com/gallery/?io8bx114yivc&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>Do you not see the utter propogonda that you present to me? You are the epitome of someone brainwashed by Arab propogonda. Come on tell me, do you believe what your "sources" say is not biased?</p>

<p>Look at this site <a href="http://judicial-inc.biz/False_Flags_summary.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://judicial-inc.biz/False_Flags_summary.htm&lt;/a>

[quote]
</p>

<p>Kristallnacht</p>

<p>When government officials were away, Jewish-paid thugs went on a rampage in Berlin and some border towns.</p>

<p>Nazis were blamed, and world opinion favored Jews

[/quote]
</p>

<p>You are the most racist, hateful, and ignorant person I have ever known. believing crap like this leads me to three conclusions:
A) You are an utter moron
B) You are racist
C) A & B</p>

<p>Overwhelming evidence exists to suppport C.</p>

<p>Look at this from your site:

[quote]
:
Israel faked a hijacking to Kenya (Idi Imin was an Israeli puppet), and then pulled a rescue, portraying themselves as elite commandos.</p>

<p>Arabs looked like monsters and the Israelis, having suffered countless persecutions, have decided to fight back.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>
[quote]
USS Cole</p>

<p>Sayanims in the Pentagon had the Cole directed to a part in Yemen, where Israeli agents had Arab patsies approach the Cole with a small boat, in order to be seen by crewmen, while they attacked it with a shape charge.</p>

<p>

[/quote]
</p>

<p>
[quote]

Sept 11 .....2001</p>

<p>The most brazen of all Israeli attacks.

[/quote]

[quote]
</p>

<p>Madrid Train ... 2002</p>

<p>Mossad killed 198 in the Madrid bomb blast.</p>

<p>Al Queda was blamed.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Everyone see? THese are the true views of hardstyle prep.</p>

<p>There is no point arguing with such a brainwashed bigot such as you. I realize that I am sounding repetitive, but this website shows your true colors.</p>

<p>"Jewish thugs were paid on Kristallnacht to kill Jews?" "it wasn't the nazis?" Wow, honestly go to hell for posting utter crap like that. Do you have any idea how offensive that is? You should be banned. Honestly, go to hell with the crap that you spew.</p>

<p>And here is some more from hardstyleprep's site

[quote]
</p>

<p>Lusitania</p>

<p>Churchill, who was 1/2 Jewish, leaked intelligence to Germany that Lusitania carried munitions, and then it was sent it in a U-boat infested area. The ship was supposedly torpedoed, and a massive bomb exploded, killing 1200.</p>

<p>This set the stage for Wilson to bring the USA into WW2, at a later date.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>This is exactly what hardstyle thinks!! Since he was a Jew, he must have leaked intelligence to the Germans in order to kill those civilians!!!</p>

<p>Hardstyle, you aren't fooling anyone. You are the most ardent and rabid racist here on these forums. While zionism and Judaism are not the same, its obvious that you have been attempting to hide your true anti-semitism behind that cliche phrase. If you honestly believe what that website says, and even more, present it as EVIDENCE IN AN ARGUMENT, you sir, are scum. You have the temerity to post an article from a website claiming that a Jewish massacre never happened, and it was the "Jewish thugs" who were paid by other Jews in order blame the innocent nazis. You can be placed among the ranks of bigots like Louis Farrakhan with your archaic and prejudiced views. Your sheer ignorance and refusal to believe valid sources is astounding, and you cling to websites that could have been written by Hitler himself. The games over, and you lose.</p>

110

<p>Israels Defense Minister Supports using Human Civilian Shields. These Zionist Hypocritical Thugs are something else!</p>

<p>IDF To Appeal Ban
On Using Human Shields
10-12-5</p>

<p>JERUSALEM (Xinhuanet) -- Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz said on Tuesday that he would appeal against the High Court of Justice's ruling to ban the use of Palestinian civilians by the army as "human shields" in operations against suspected militants. </p>

<p>Local newspaper Ha'aretz quoted Mofaz as saying that he would stand before the justices to present his arguments which he said would justify continuing the use of "human shields". </p>

<p>The Israeli army have used Palestinian civilians as "shields" during military operations to search houses thought to be booby-trapped or enter homes of suspected Palestinian militants inadvance of Israeli soldiers who sought to arrest the suspects. </p>

<p>Last week, a three-judge High Court of Justice panel ruled that the use of "human shields" was illegal and violated the international law. </p>

<p>The ruling came in response to a petition filed by seven human rights groups. </p>

<p>Following the court's decision, the Israel Defense Forces said it had forbidden the use of Palestinians as "human shields"against possible Palestinian militant attacks or as hostages, but did not rule out using "human shields" which can help avoid "greater damage to local residents, to soldiers and to property." Enditem</p>

111

<p>I didn't even read your article. because the fact remains. Look at you, you are utterly pathetic. All you do is post articles, you don't even comment on them! This is ridiculous. ARguing with you is like arguing with a brick wall. You are both stubborn and cannot think for yourselves. Its funny, because you keep on posting these articles, but the fact remains. You base your decision on websites that post a "Timeline of Israeli terrorism", and it starts with saying "Churchill was a jew and he leaked secrets to the enemy making thousands of civilians die." Its obvious from your sources that you are extremely racist. At least admit it.</p>

<p>You didn't even post a source this time. Look, you can't anwser a basic question, so I'll ask it again: Do you agree that your sources are extremely slanted?</p>

<p>Does anyone else see how ridiculous hardstyleprep's sources are?</p>

112

<p>Turtle, you're the most one sided Zionist Gangster loving apologist on Earth. You're open minded huh! Name some horrific Israeli atrocities for the readership. We're waiting Turtleeeeeeeee!</p>

113

<p>It doesn't matter what I am. I'm fine with criticizing some of Israel's policies, since I do as well. However, I won't stand by while you post such utterly ridiculous sites as EVIDENCE in your arguments. You still haven't anwsered my question. Do you admit that source is biased and BLATANTLY anti-semitic? What solution can you provide, if you are sooo against Israel? Drive the Jews into the sea? That seems to be what Nasser offered. What's your alternative. All you seem to do is criticize, yet you don't offer an alternative. Therefore, it is pointless arguing with someone as obstinate as you, seeing how your half-assed attempts to discredit Israel do nothing but show yhow you can whine but you can't fix problems, and you look at specific cases whilst you miss the bigger picture. Oh right, the bigger picture is that Jews control the media. My bad. I guess I am the one who is missing the bigger picture.</p>

114

<p>He wallows around with some nebulous sanitized statement that he "I criticize some of Israels policies". But did you notice the Israeli apologist 7 defender no matter what terrible things Israel does said nada, nothing about the Zionist Israeli Thugs. You're so honest 7 fair Turtle, just like the media when it comes to little land grabbing Israel.</p>

115

<p>You still haven't anwsered my question. What are you hiding from?</p>

116

<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general68/murder.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.rense.com/general68/murder.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

117

<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general47/temp.htm%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.rense.com/general47/temp.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

118

<p>Yet you still haven't anwsered my question.</p>

119

<p>Oh and don't forget to click the ad for the psychic pill right next to the article on the link between Jews err I mean Zionists and aliens. Still think your sources are not biased and anti-semitic?</p>

120

<p>ok, hardstyleprep has completely lost it. FYI, the site you quote has posted this article as well.
<a href="http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/fortress2.html%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.vialls.com/myahudi/fortress2.html&lt;/a>
I didn't bother to read the whole thing, since it's beneath me..
Still, the top of the article claims Israel has detonated two micro-nucs in Beirut. A nuclear detonation of any size is detectable anywhere in the world and can be measured via seismic anomalies and changes in ambient radiation. In fact, there are people whose entire lives are dedicated to this one field. So clearly, this site is credible in the least, unless you also contend that France, Germany, Japan, China and every other country with the ability to detect nuc. detonations are 'zionist collaberators'.</p>