<p>ok and was the black astrophysicist passage on english or reading? if english, did you guys put “reach for the stars” for the question that asked how he should show that he wants others to succeed and he loves astronomy</p>
<p>yes reach for the stars was the answer for that one because it was the only choice that remotely showed his “dedication to helping others” or something along those lines</p>
<p>The answer was the shoot for the stars answer, because it paired both the love of astrophysics and helping others.</p>
<p>can anyone make a list of all correct answers???</p>
<p>and at one point there was a choice between… either like all or china, africa, and india.</p>
<p>which one did you guys put? i cant remember but i think i put all the countries because at the beginning of the paragraph it talks about dating back to other countries or something.</p>
<p>I <em>think</em> I put like all—it was the q with “yes bc”, “yes bc bla”, “no bc”, and “no bc bla”, right? I think I put something with no because it distracts or something…</p>
<p>hey did any of yal get the Enstein one where if i should add the parenthesis about the noelles theorem or something?</p>
<p>Yeah–I did. I put no–what about you guys?</p>
<p>i put yes b/c it couldn’t be attributed to a single source as shown in the first sentence… b/c of the three different countries</p>
<p>the phrase inside the parentheses should be eliminated because it unnecessarily restated what was already mentioned.</p>
<p>The sentence before mentioned the mathematical theorem named after noelles, so having (Noelles’s Theorem) in the next sentence was unnecessary and needed to be removed.</p>
<p>yeah I got rid of the parentheses</p>
<p>has it been confirmed that point ahead was the right answer for that question? I really thought point with nothing after it wouldn’t work in the sentence…</p>
<p>Point ahead was the answer.
Also, the theorem thing should be omitted because it was redundant… It was already stated in a previous sentence</p>
<p>does anyone know if you were supposed to add… china, india, and japan in that one essay…</p>
<p>and on the einstein one…
the answers were like
a) he
b)even though
c)although</p>
<p>what was the answer to this question?</p>
<p>I said whatever was closest to “yes b/c it shows how it cannot be traced back to one origin”</p>
<p>99% sure it was correct</p>
<p>EDIT: And I believe that one was “even though” because the point was that even Einstein’s ideas weren’t completely original. None of the others worked.</p>
<p>Did you guys get “As” for one of them?</p>
<p>The Einstein one had:
*Even he, though,
and
*In the meantime, he
(I think I put in the meantime, since the even he, though, sounded wrong…But what did you guys get?</p>
<p>The answer was "Even he, though, … "</p>
<p>I’m 100% sure about that.</p>
<p>ya i thought it was talking about originality the whole time. and then it said einstein was original too so i put he. grrrr minus one</p>
<p>nobody has really said or not whether they put the addition of the three countries in the three plants section</p>
<p>it was the 3 countries. it was the answer choice with i think the incas included</p>
<p>The Einstein answer was “Even he, though,”</p>
<p>Regarding the three countries- i included the three countries and im almost positive that was the right choice</p>