<p>o.O What were the two no errors in writing?
I only found one...</p>
<p>Yeah, I only got one "no error" in the identify-the-error section.</p>
<p>dude are u crazy wry? so the uncle is devious and not surly which means rude</p>
<p>one E fo writing was the comparing with the artist with a lot of "as"</p>
<p>yes all of the korean passage had something do with self. agreed</p>
<p>there are two Es</p>
<p>and how bout the question wwith "equal, if not more than" is this part wrong with "equal to, if not more than" as the correction</p>
<p>I think I got 2 no errors for Writing.
And I thought the Korean passage was pretty straightforward.
I got the identity and self-something answer for the Korean passage.</p>
<p>Yeah, I also marked self for the korean passage</p>
<p>Yeah, I agree that it was "wry", which can mean ironic... the uncle's comments were ironic and sarcastic.</p>
<p>yeah i put that innocent for that equal question</p>
<p>YESS I GOT THE WRY ONE RIGHT. I'm going to go party now.
Anyways, innocentboy, I got what you got for the "equal to" question. I think it was missing the "to".</p>
<p>What was the other "no error" you guys got? I thought the only one was the question involving Charlotte Bronte.</p>
<p>do any of u rememeber that question about witch hunts and it had neglect in it. it was in the improving sentences. was it a matter with parrell</p>
<p>I think it was a parallel, chinnu.</p>
<p>the wry one can be debated i guess surly does fit too and the uncle is being rude</p>
<p>to someone up there... as in up there ont his page.. </p>
<p>it's not humanism or renaissance.. it's ancient greek.. haha first time i read ur question i was like.. were you a wednesday taker or something :)
but yeah... it's supposed to be in present</p>
<p>i don't know if this was the bronte question. one compared a person singing and writing skill or it have been art. i put no erro for that. it has than underlinved if that helps</p>
<p>sorry 09xoxo i have AP Euro. everytime i see greeks, i think renaissance and humanism</p>
<p>Snowia-- same with me for the writing.</p>
<p>About the Korean passage... the question was something like she learned that learning about your past lets you...
one option: something about self identity & understanding yourself?
one option: identifying with your country of origin.</p>
<p>I put the second option: my logic was that she admitted that she actually DIDN'T really identify with her true self or whatever, so I didn't think that first option was it.</p>
<p>okay so probably 2 NO ERRORS on writing anyone wanna exchange aim to discuss faster post aim here</p>
<p>etyee12</p>
<p>chinnu, there was an error with that sentence - parallel structure. don't remember about the specifics though..</p>
<p>contumacious- i put # 1.</p>