The Official PSAT For Saturday October 21, 2006

<p>no. he compared it to the "last tournament we saw." or something like that. comparing two tennis matches isn't faulty to me :S</p>

<p>no he was comparing the audience of the last tournament to just another tournament. i think. i don't maybe you're right and i just intrepreted it wrong</p>

<p>oh you might be right i dont really remember that question too well. I just remember "We saw" was underlined</p>

<p>for the question about the sqaure inscribed the circle was one of the choices 36? and for the grid-in triangle question, did they say the side had to be an integer?</p>

<p>for the question about the sqaure inscribed the circle was one of the choices 36? and for the grid-in triangle question, did they say the side had to be an integer?</p>

<hr>

<p>Yah one of the choices was 36, the answer was 32 though i think. (dont remember)</p>

<p>I don't think they said anything about integers for the triangle problem</p>

<p>It was "but it only impacted the textile industry", and that was the correct answer. </p>

<p>EDIT: Yeah -- it said "...at the Wimbleton tournament... than the tournament we saw." The last bit is wrong because it should be "than AT the tournament we saw."</p>

<p>any1 remember any questions on the writing section</p>

<p>for the sentence completion about the architects, was the answer "courted ... ? "</p>

<p>that's what i put, i was unsure about that one</p>

<p>Yes, it was courted/accomplished</p>

<p>The wimbledon question was C. It was c.the last tournament d.we saw.</p>

<p>crud , i got the courted... one wrong ><
I thought CR was kinda hard, but who knows...
Does anyone remember any questions from the short Biography Section or the Twinkle Star passage</p>

<p>that biography section was HARD.</p>

<p>1) both of these passages agree about what
- i think it was that he influenced biographies of the time</p>

<p>and if x=-y... then x^2 would = y^2 too... like...</p>

<p>it factored out to
(x+y) (x-y) (x+y)</p>

<p>so it HAD to be x^2 and y^2...</p>

<p>lurker.. yupp :)</p>

<p>For the Wimbledon one, it was comparing the ATMOSPHERE of one match to another MATCH. So a faulty comparison there. At least that's what I put haha</p>

<p>For the Twinkle star passage, what was the one "the main purpose of this passage"? Was it to explain a fundamental issue of astrophysics or something?</p>

<p>I put to introduce an explanation of a phenomenon..... something like that ???</p>

<p>Crappp.</p>

<p>Also, on the Identifying Sentence Errors, how many Es (no error) did you get? I only got one :-/</p>

<p>that that was one answer... just different takes on the wording.. but yeah i put that one</p>

<p>I put an intro to whatever ... It made more sense since in the beginning he tried to relate it to 'twinke twinkle.'</p>

<p>Also, yah there weren't many no errors. i only got like 1,2,or 3 and I know one of them is wrong</p>

<p>The passages agreed that Stayner (was that his name?) changed the standard of biographies of his time.</p>

<p>Another question about their general view of Stayner was that he was an unusually skilled writer.</p>