I just finished reading through any articles that had catchy titles in the 250 pages of Music Major threads. One of the fun parts, reading from newest to oldest was watching very informed members (I think of musicprnt, for example) go back in time when they were newer to the topics. There are some common themes through the years, such as trying to dispense with most/all non-music activities, subject to good grades being able to earn scholarships that makes attendance financially possible. Another theme seems to drift over time; the selection of the primary instructor is on one hand of paramount importance; whereas, on the other hand, the instructor’s potential to disappear from the scene and the other important consideration - the fellow students’ networking base - make choosing exactly the perfect instructor seem less critical. So a reader could get a different feeling depending on which year is read.
There is one thing that caught my attention. My S plays an unrelated instrument, aside from the bass that he hopes to make a living with. For that instrument, there is a specialty website where you can post videos of your performance and get very meaningful critique from the viewers. We received very accurate feedback about where S stood in the field and used some of those ideas to seek out correction. I think the CC point of view would be that competitions and placements in audition-based camps and professional assessment would reveal this kind of information. The nice thing about those video assessments is improvements are easily reassessed as they occur. You could also see many opinions and get a feel for the median opinion.
I am not only lightly-informed, but also a somewhat sensitive/touchy/aloof person, which may explain the following. I get feeling that some new forum members, through the years, are trying to lock on to where they belong musically or how to find their level and pursue it, yet after all is discussed, I come away with the feeling that if you haven’t already been studying since early youth, performing in a youth orchestra in an upper chair, and aiming for a highly esteemed college, there is not much to talk about. This varies by instrument, but is often found with piano and violin and less with voice. I am even now imagining that the second paragraph I have posted here may, rather than be conversational, would draw the question of why is he playing an instrument that is not related to his main goal, to which I would have a sub-optimal answer. What do you think, maybe I wrongly perceive? I think late-comers or late-bloomers may have a harder time being guided. I think it makes sense that high levels of desired achievement requires work/talent/etc and not just warm fuzzy feelings and wishes or mis-steps. This is a good forum, and I hope to report relevant news or observations as S’ path unfolds.