I think for me I would not sign a kid up for a school at which I believed at the outset he/she would end up in the bottom 20%. I don’t think a degree from Star School #1 would make up for the experience of always being the weakest student. In days of old, when prep school students put their names down for colleges on actual lists, one might say the education provided by Star School #1 justified any experience. ( ln days of old, I gather students were often registered at birth, which would lead to a degree of heterogeneity in the student body.)
I think we live up to or down to expectations. Being a big fish in a small pond can be a better experience than being a minnow in the ocean. One absolute requirement for us is that our children are able to “find their people” among the student body. It doesn’t mean you have to love everyone. It does mean that you have to be able to find some friends. I don’t think anything makes up for misery.
I was thinking recently of how quickly time seems to pass now, and how slowly it passed in my teens. For a teenager, four years of misery can set the stage for adulthood. I read Prep. The protagonist struck me as a deeply unhappy person. I wonder if that reflects the author’s experience at boarding school?
On an absolute level, the top 50+ boarding schools offer more to smart kids than their local schools. I find it ungracious of parents (or alums) to get into fights over which school(s) constitute the “tippy top.” I’ve met many really successful people in my life. Very few were top students in middle school. Many had to overcome challenges. High school is a time to learn and to grow. At adulthood, we continue to cherish our children, not their grade point averages. A recent obituary of a young person which listed GPA made me sad and thoughtful.
To balance that out, there are people who do better when the material is more challenging. When the material covered is too easy, they zone out and do worse. So it might not be a choice between Cs in the more demanding and As in the less demanding. It could be a choice between Cs everywhere. In which case, a parent really needs to suss out when a school might decide to part ways with a student. (Probably best done at revisits. I think it would be really hard to say, I think my child will be a C student. How low does the GPA have to go before he gets kicked out?)
If it’s a Cs everywhere situation, then I think there needs to be an appraisal of the overall experience. 1) In Star School #1, you will have to work every free moment to be able to stay enrolled. Your courses will be interesting, but you will not do well in college placement, in large part because you will not be able to take part in extracurricular activities. It will be grueling. 2) In Happy School #2, you will have more time to explore extracurriculars. Your recommendations will be better, because you can play a larger role in the community. You might be bored in class. You will have to work hard to overcome your tendency to zone out. You might be more likely to become a school leader.
So it depends. It’s also good to ask about different levels of challenge available. Not everyone takes honors in every class.
I would only choose a school which expects 3 hours of sleep from its students for a student who was wildly off the scale in intelligence and energy. For a bright student with the potential to attend the most selective colleges at the end of high school, I would not choose such a school. It is possible to burn out. High school should not be a death march. No one does their best work under sleep deprivation. Copious research shows how harmful a lack of sleep is to short and long term learning. I would really worry about students learning precisely the wrong lessons as to how to handle an academic schedule.