<p>It seems you already answered your own question. You are an international student. Michigan has a much bigger international reputation than Tufts. </p>
<p>Re: math, you want the better undergrad experience, regardless of graduate school program rankings, which are what blue85 has posted. Tufts, being smaller and more LAC-like, would offer you more direct access to profs and research opportunities. </p>
<p>Tufts for undergrad and U Michigan for grad. Best of both worlds.</p>
<p>Obviously none of these statements can be “proven”, including yours, rjkofnovi, but I’m not the first on CC to note that attendance at smaller LACs and universities, by dint of size, can mean less competition for and greater access to personal contact with profs and research opportunities. </p>
<p>Gondaline19: not sure where you are getting your numbers, but they appear to be pretty inaccurate. You state above: “Tufts IR (and this includes masters, PhD. AND undergraduate programs) is #5; U Mich # 19”
^^^ ^^^^</p>
<p>From Wikipedia: "“Inside the Ivory Tower” is a ranking of the top university graduate and undergraduate programs in international relations. The ranking is produced by the Teaching, Research, and International Policy (TRIP) Project at the College of William and Mary and is published periodically by the magazine Foreign Policy. The TRIP project attempts to interview “international relations faculty from every four-year college and university in the United States, as identified by U.S. News & World Report,” although the methodology has changed over the years.[1][2][3] The survey design and compilation of results are done by the College of William & Mary’s Institute for the Theory and Practice of International Relations.[4] The survey began in 2005 as a survey of International Relations Scholars in the United States. </p>
<p>One of the questions asked respondents to rank International Relations graduate schools in the U.S. The survey has since been expanded to include undergraduate programs.[5] The survey began including universities outside of the U.S. in 2009.[1] The next iteration of the survey will be conducted in late summer of 2014.</p>
<p>The same knee-jerk rankings you put forth on every other U Michigan thread, rjkofnovi. Does not address OP’s question, does it? </p>
<p>And where did you get the assumption that just because the OP is international that he/ she won’t stay in US? OP is interested in the better math/ CS undergrad program and ultimate grad school placement, not which school is more prestigious internationally. </p>
<p>“Obviously none of these statements can be “proven”, including yours, rjkofnovi, but I’m not the first on CC to note that attendance at smaller LACs and universities, by dint of size, can mean less competition for and greater access to personal contact with profs and research opportunities…”…at schools not the quality of Michigan. </p>
At Michigan, you can do research in the first semester of your freshman year. All you have to do is sign-up for the Undergraduate Research Opportunity Program (UROP). UROP targets freshmen and sophomores. Five years ago, the program was opened to transfer students with an emphasis on those from community colleges. </p>
<p>UROP turns 25 this year. Today, more than 1,300 freshman/sophomore students and 700 faculty researchers are engaging in cutting-edge research under the program.</p>
<p>Now prove that you can do better at Tufts.</p>
<p>Michigan is ranked in the top 10 in both Math/CSE, compared to Tufts at the 70’s. It’s obvious that Michigan has much stronger faculty and facilities. It’s especially important in math … that is, if you are very good.</p>
<p>And to clarify, blue85, the link is here re: Tufts ranking in MASTERS IR programs, which derives from the same “Inside the Ivory Tower” list put forth by Foreign Policy Magazine:</p>
<p>But then, this is probably all off topic, as OP in fact didn’t note an interest in IR, only noted its reputation at Tufts in final sentence of original post. Somehow, the IR mention developed a life of its own?</p>
<p>Ultimately, OP needs to decide which among many factors–rankings, particulars of individual programs, quality of life, small vs. large, etc.–are most pertinent. </p>
<p>And my D at Tufts knows several peers who are doing research in their freshman year. She herself was able to garner a coveted research spot next year in her STEM field based on the personal encouragement and tutelage of one of her profs. </p>
<p>Sometimes the way information is arranged matters. </p>
<p>Yes. Michigan is a bigger school than Tufts. There are lots of advantages to a large school, and there are fantastic opportunities to make the community smaller within your chosen field. And because of the school size, connections, endowments and reach, it can provide opportunities that some smaller schools cannot.</p>
<p>To the OP? I hope you have visited both, but failing that, I would look at some of the numbers presented here, think hard about your goals and what YOU imagine your ideal college environment to be, and press the yes at the school that clicks. </p>
<p>Small class sizes does not necessarily mean quality. UofM ranks 12th in nation for undergraduate teaching. Tufts did not appear on the top school list. UofM also is ranked 13th on the peer assignment rating, which ranks colleges based off their reputation by officials at other top universities. Tufts is once again absent from this list. I do not mean to knock Tufts too much. It truly is an excellent university, and the OP should be proud to be accepted to both schools. </p>