<p>I was a student at UC Davis. I didn't know what i wanted to do and had little confidence in myself for completing the program i was enrolled in (biochem engineering). I got kicked out at the end of the year, and was told to complete classes in desired major with a 3.1 to reenter the uni. </p>
<p>After a year of being lost, taking and dropping classes in attempt to switch back into UCD, i decided that it wasn't worth it. To return, i would need to reapply for my financial aid. If i get it back, i would have to take 5k loans each year, which would be at least 25k by the time i graduate (took 5k out too with freshmen year). If i attend sf state, i would live with my parents, so the cal grant alone would cover more than what is needed.</p>
<p>If i go back to ucd, i wouldn't be able to hack engineering. The closest (somewhat, i mean all majors suck for employment nowadays besides Computer science and engineering, right?) employable major that is suitable for my average aptitude would be managerial econ ( econ B.A would be too theoretical for employment). </p>
<p>So does the major matter more, or does the school? My other choice would be to go to sf state and major in accounting. I understand that without a CPA, i wouldn't get far with my degree, which would be limited to doing outsourced work. But at least with an accounting degree, my chances of employment are higher, right? I could work for start ups and do some bookkeeping or something. Also, I would most likely be working at starbucks even with an accounting degree. That is doable if i have no loans to pay back. The accounting degree would give me useful skills, even if not employable. </p>
<p>Looking at the courses of managerial econ, it is just basically a business degree that requires you to take the whole set of calculus. So would a business degree from a middle tier UC be better, or would an accounting degree from sf state be better?</p>