<p>Oh look, another one of these threads....</p>
<p>First of all, sorry for the lack of information, but I was writing a really in dept forum post about this thread, but College Confidential logged me out and alas...
I'm a recent high school graduate who put deposits on UCSD, Emory-oxford, and UGA. I've visited UGA and I know the types of students that go there (and a near 1/3 of my high school graduating class will be attending). It is most definitely not the school I want to go to. </p>
<p>This boils it down to UCSD and Emory-Oxford. Because I was fortunate enough to place deposits on all 3, when Emory inflated their price to nearly 4x the initial estimate, I wasn't locked with them. </p>
<p>Regardless, here is what I know of them:</p>
<p>EMORY:
Oxford campus is only a 2 year deal, then I would get an immediate transfer to Emory University in Atlanta. However, I'm not sure this necessarily justifies going to Oxford, and I'm not crazy about Emory. Firstly, I've visited Oxford for students' weekend. I was incredibly surprised to see that a student I knew who had been expelled for blowing an airhorn in class had been accepted as well even with his mediocre grades. And to be blunt... the campus is just terrible. Imagine The Shire from the Lord of the Rings, except a college campus. The entire population is only slightly larger than my Senior graduating class. The town is incredibly small and a fair distance from main campus in Atlanta. On my visit to main campus, I was very impressed by the... architecture, but I never saw the inside of any labs (just a computer lab with the most expensive Macs you've ever seen). More importantly, the academics. Emory is renowned for its strong core curriculum which I agree is an important part of the undergraduate experience. However, Emory tends to attract mostly pre-professional students (pre-med, pre-law, etc.). I see it as foolish to decide the fate of my educational career so early, especially for a fairly common spot in the labor force (and I'd like to think a little bit bigger too). Although I'm going to offend a couple of readers (flame sheilds up), I somewhat agree with stereotype that pre-proffesional is the scourge of mankind. Linking back to the idea of a strong core curriculum, while the school may offer several courses, that doesn't necessitate they have substance. I prefer the Aristotelian approach to knowledge that it should be learned for the pure sake of it. Classes should be about questioning the fundamentals behind knowledge and pushing questions that expand a field's disciplinary ranges. I feel as though because so many attend for the purpose of pre-proffesional jobs, I'll be memorizing textbooks. And by matters of reciprocation, I can only expect that the students at Emory agree that rote learning is a basis of true knowledge. Being around such people would surely drive me mad. As a concluding summary, being in Oxford would be torturous, going to Emory 2 years later might be OK, but if the ideas surrounding the university don't hold value, than I would be dissatisfied. </p>
<p>UCSD:
I don't live in California, nor have I been there in several years. What I do know, however, is that California is a whole different country compared to the sleepy state of Georgia. UCSD seems to be the college of students who were not accepted to Berkeley and LA. However, I think that the sole fact that these high-hopes students had not been accepted to Berkeley and LA, the school earns its own prestige. According to US News and Student Dream Tantalizer report, UCSD ranks 37 compared to Emory's 20 (Oxford isn't mentioned). I'm not one to believe in the advice arbitrated by some anonymous internet stranger (Oh wait, why am I--), but I know ranking does indeed mean something in deciding these matters. UCSD seems to have a strong reputation in the humanities while also maintaining an extremely strong reputation in the sciences. Also, by merit of it existing as a UC school, the curriculum is probably strong. However, my kritik on this idea is already expressed in my thoughts about Emory. Again, UCSD tends to attract a multitude of pre-proffesional students (mostly premed). Even though I feel as though they both offer great courses, it seems more likely people who want to build hydron colliders live in California. One thing to note, compared to Emory, UCSD is enormous. Although it is split up into 6 separate colleges, (I would be attending Revelle) class sizes will be guaranteed to be at least 3 times as large. But with a larger population of students come a larger course catalog. I don't really seem to care as much about class size as I have a tendency to stick out in conversations, but this may be a big key factor. Finally, California is broke. And the UC system is taking more cuts than my lawn on chore day.</p>
<p>I'm quite sorry if this post comes off as intrusive or malicious to anyone. And I'm not trying to leech the easiest information possible. I've done a lot of research (and CC lurking) on this already, and the threads on this website that pose the exact same question don't fully go in detail. And once more, I wish I could go into even more detail but I'm thoroughly frustrated after losing my first post...</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>