<p>It's relative, I guess. We just happen to have a lot more green.</p>
<p>I dunno...they both look pretty green to me. It doesn't look like Cal has "a lot" more green. Some, maybe...</p>
<p>Where is this picture taken from? Is it on the back hills or a building?</p>
<p>The only part of the main campus that I haven't quite fully explored is the area around Tolman. It's a forest there with loads of squirrels I heard!</p>
<p>It might have to do with the fact that the UCLA campus is 419 acres large, and the Berkeley campus is 1232 acres. Yeah, a little bit more. Please.</p>
<p>Are we talking total area of green, or green per square mile? ;)</p>
<p>How do we define "green" in this argument? Is it only trees, or does grass count? Do we add in ugly plants, too? :p</p>
<p>Berkeley scores a FIVE on the squirrelmeter.
UCLA on the other hand... scores a piddly three.</p>
<p>I think you all know who the winner is now.</p>
<p>karch,</p>
<p>I have never agreed with this ranking. UCLA is at least a 4, if not a 4.5. UCLA squirrels are just way more awesome than a 3.</p>
<p>UCLAri: You know I am not going to agree with you on UCLA squirrels... they get a 3 AT BEST! They are scawny and any Cal squirrel could kick any UCLA squirrel's A*S :)</p>
<p>Dude...seriously. NO. Scrawny? I saw a sumo squirrel at Anderson that was practically knocking over a trash can to get to half-eaten biscotti. </p>
<p>I had a squirrel at LuValle Commons take a french fry FROM MY HAND.</p>
<p>UCLA squirrels are fat and have chutzpah. How are they not at least a 4?</p>
<p>A bunch of friends just went on the school's college tour and went to UCLA. A few were saying they didn't want to go to UCLA simply because of their squirrels. Supposedly, they can be pretty vicious lol It was quite entertaining to listen to the anecdote about a squirrel who stole a girl's foodsomethingoranother and ran away. The girl said something like, "SECOND TIME THIS WEEK!" with various other magical words that would turn into asterisks if I were to type them.</p>