UCSC admissions

Transfer Students
141

<p>I have already accepted the fact that I won that argument. You never even responded to my syllogisms, which prove that you are incorrect. If you want to make an attempt to disqualify the second premise, then by all means do. But I am afraid I trust M-Websters definition. You apparently are an authority over webster in your own mind. My syllogistic arguments are valid, and sound unless you want to pursue the ridiculous idea that M-Webster is incorrect. maybe you can share your "warrancy" for this idea. I really dont care what your warped ideas of logic can conjure up on this notion, incredulous was used correctly, and you implied it was not. You were wrong according to M-Websters and even if you went on the definition of the other websites, you still did not have enough information to say I was incorrect. You could only have said that my definition was different than yours, not that my definition conflicts with yours. If you cannot accept this, you are a fool. lol... </p>

<p>It is very obvious that you can demonstrate a condescending and superior attitude with out overtly claiming such. you are a fool. I am growing bored with you now, you are not challenging or interesting to me. You are incredibly shallow. :). </p>

<p>WARRANCY? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA</p>

142

<p>As of 10:40 kidicarus is no longer an account on this board. I am no longer available to hand anyone their own asses... WARRANCY? ZAAAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAH</p>

143

<p>
[quote]
I have already accepted the fact that I won that argument.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>As the dogmatist always does.</p>

<p>
[quote]
You never even responded to my syllogisms, which prove that you are incorrect.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Once again, your selective reading is showing: does begging the question ring a bell?</p>

<p>
[quote]
If you want to make an attempt to disqualify the second premise, then by all means do. But I am afraid I trust M-Websters definition.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Much to your own detriment.</p>

<p>
[quote]
My syllogistic arguments are valid,

[/quote]
</p>

<p>For the millionth time, it begs the question!</p>

<p>
[quote]
You were wrong according to M-Websters and even if you went on the definition of the other websites, you still did not have enough information to say I was incorrect.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Yes it is; the information is all in black and white. Just do a search on google or at your local library;)</p>

<p>
[quote]
You could only have said that my definition was different than yours, not that my definition conflicts with yours. If you cannot accept this, you are a fool. lol...

[/quote]
</p>

<p>So much for the logic, eh? Ie. If you agree, then you are right, but if you do not agree, then you are stupid; that sounds like an argument Bush would use. </p>

<p>
[quote]
you are a fool.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Your maturity astounds me!</p>

<p>
[quote]
I am growing bored with you now, you are not challenging or interesting to me. You are incredibly shallow. .

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Whatever makes you feel better:), actions speak louder than words.</p>

<p>
[quote]
WARRANCY? AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

[/quote]
</p>

<p>So now who is being condescending here? The one who laughs derisively at an individual who admits an error?</p>

<p>
[quote]
As of 10:40 kidicarus is no longer an account on this board. I am no longer available to hand anyone their own asses... WARRANCY? ZAAAAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAH

[/quote]
</p>

<p>As usual, if he cannot argue, he will simply run away. I knew I would end up saying this twice due to your hypocrisy:</p>

<p>Bye!</p>

144

<p>my.ucsc.edu does have some serious issues. In addition to that, they don't even keep the professors up on it -- the chaos that took away a whole week of classes in trying to figure out the sections/auto-drop! Oi. More trouble than it's worth, I think...</p>

<p>... though, it's not that bad. Pretty organized. And you can check most things relevant to your student account there -- including evals.</p>

<p>On a tangent... anyone else from UCSC, how many evals have you NOT received? In my first quarter here, out of four classes, I received three. I am miffed because that missing eval was likely to be my best -- and yet there's a frustrating blank spot there. Le sigh.</p>

<p>At least the weather has been awesome these past few days. It's just absolutely gorgeous around campus on days like these past few.</p>

145

<p>Well, I must admit that, other than speaking ebonics or asian slangs, I do possess a certain degree of ability to use "5 dollar words". Unfortunately, there is a certain user who tend to argue that anything that does not come from his mouth is not proper English (my friend actually went speechless when he saw your posts and begged me to keep our little discussion alive for its great entertainment value.)</p>

<p>I can't believe Kidarius choose to self-respect and leave this discussion that has turned into mudsling, I guess someone out there respect his/her precious time more than I do.</p>

<p>What is fallacy of logic? Fallacy of logic occurs when a person's mind break down and stop making connections. Before Albert Einstein, no one would say that light get bend by gravity, for that's a fallacy of logic, but now, can you say "light get bend by gravity field?"</p>

<p>Additionally, there is some user here who think that a person who can speak English well is a person who's superior than everyone else (I guess I got a F here for fallacy of logic, but since 99.9% of the general population can see what I see, a quote is not necessary), and in that person's complex mind, he tend to think that he is the ONLY one who can speak English properly.</p>

<p>Mind you, this is not a CS steam discussion forum, nor is this forum dedicated to some Hentai lovers. This is a college forum, populated by posters with roughly the same educational level. Yet, This poster feels that ONLY he is the most knowledgable and educated person.</p>

<p>Well, unfortunately, he is not. Let me give you all a real life example. A person I've known for years actually transfered to MIT during the 70's, got 20 Bachelors degrees, 8 Masters, and 2 Ph.Ds. His English skill is so bad that he is barely understandable. However, I am sure that he turns in more tax money to Uncle Sam than our English master here, although he can't use words like "abstruse" or "esoterics" or whatever 5 dollars words out there.</p>

<p>I won't debate with that user here (no need to debate with someone who will not acknowledge their mistakes, kinda like Nazis. You don't debate with Nazis, you fight them, can you say fallacy of logic here? Nor will I even attempt to read his posts. I am afraid that he is the very first political/social extremist I've seen.)</p>

146

<p>Additionally, this thread needs to be closed. Kudos to nspeds for ruining another fine thread.</p>

147

<p>How could I possibly be entirely accountable for a argument that both you and Kid exacerbated; if there is anyone to blame, it is all three of us.</p>

<p>And cheers on closing the thread, especially since you just "bumped" it.</p>

<p>Edit: Look at this kind of analysis:</p>

<p>
[quote]
I won't debate with that user here (no need to debate with someone who will not acknowledge their mistakes, kinda like Nazis. You don't debate with Nazis, you fight them, can you say fallacy of logic here? Nor will I even attempt to read his posts. I am afraid that he is the very first political/social extremist I've seen.)

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Such reasoning is a textbook example of bad argumentation; I do not fault one for not knowing good English, but I do fault one for failing to learn more English, which Blackdream's selective reading allows him to do. Someone who argues that logic, a framework that serves as the foundation for many disciplines - including science - is "wrong" is foolish beyond all comprehensible levels.</p>

<p>.elicebmI</p>