<p>there are two places I would love to live... Texas and Southern California. (I live in SoCal, and grew up in Texas).
I intend to apply to either of these schools, but was wondering if there are any major concerns about either one of these programs
Why choose one over the other?
Will going to one, instead of the other, REALLY put me at any sort of a disadvantage?
Any opinions on em?</p>
<p>Blackstone, Bain, McKinsey, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley are all rated as top recruiters for BHP. You get more attention by being in the honors classes and BHP has their own advisor when it comes for jobs and all that too.</p>
<p>BHP for sure. It's been said to be second only to Wharton which is not surprising considering its recruting, attention, and academics. It is pretty hard to get into (near ivy-like stats), and very well respected. </p>
<p>For the regular program (McCombs) its a toss up between the two, but I would give Texas the upside because its cheaper if you are a resident.</p>
<p>I always saw it as, I apply to both (possible Wharton and whatnot, but I really dislike the NorthEast), and if I get into both, I would choose BHP, and if only one and not the other, I wouldn't be unhappy.
I was just trying to get... well the exact answers I got.
thanks</p>
<p>personally, i think the choice should be more where you want to work after you graduate. USC will obviously give you more opportunities in california; while Mccombs is relatively unknown here.</p>
<p>yup, if you want to live in SoCal then I think employers would be more impressed about Marshall than McCombs honors. If you want to live in Texas, other way around.</p>