<p>^That’s a poor answer for our low graduation rates. As it’s been discussed–almost all programs at UW are either not application based, or open to the public after a short time period. These programs often don’t fill up, so any student requiring business, engineering, L&S, Agricultural, Human Ecology, or Environmental courses can pursue his or her degree requirements.</p>
<p>And, as Barrons, mentioned, 2 of the 3 main application-based programs have sophomore admissions. There’s only 2 semesters where the student isn’t an engineering or business student. In those two semesters, the student can either complete gen ed requirements or begin taking engineering/business courses. There’s plenty to do for everyone. </p>
<p>IMO, the problem is that there’s no proactive advising. Students can float through school without ever visiting their advisers. There should be mandatory 4 year plan schedules for each incoming freshman. A student should be visiting his or her adviser once a semester to make sure they’re on track–if they don’t visit there should be a hold on their registration. </p>
<p>These are simple, cheap initiatives to get students actively thinking about graduation. Elite privates often have 85-90% of the class graduate in 4 years. Yeah, part of the reason is because they’re so ridiculously expensive. But it’s also because these privates have advisers holding a student’s hand through the process. UW gives excellent attention to those who seek it. Instead, it should be attending to every student at least once a semester.</p>
<p>You assume it’s a problem with UW, Jiff–probably because that’s your bias. It might be a problem with students.</p>