<p>@emeraldevi</p>
<p>I remember deciding on the “creative philosophy” answer. I was fairly confident about it at the time.</p>
<p>@ARDink
If I remember correctly, the answer to the median/mode question was C. Which was 22.</p>
<p>I too chose “creative philosophy”, and 22 f</p>
<p>I too chose “creative philosophy”, and 22 for the mode question.
Out of the whole test, I personally feel I did the worst on the fuel questions in CR.</p>
<p>Any chance at all that the writing curve this year could go 80, 80? Or just anything less harsh than 80, 77?</p>
<p>@Alexandrina</p>
<p>Ok good. 22 is what I put as well. :)</p>
<p>@jjatty: Awesome find! That should put any current arguments to rest.</p>
<p>Two things:
- Was the elite/latitude question in section one?</p>
<p>2) Does anyone remember the Winston Churchill question. Whoever does would literally be my hero. </p>
<p>I also put moistened…</p>
<p>I also remembered another question from the language passage. It was asking what the phrase “grains of sand on the shore” meant or something…I put infinite.</p>
<p>Any chance -4 (3 wrong, -1 guessing penalty) will be a 74??</p>
<p>“showing the reason why Machu Piccu was an important place (the special architecture)”</p>
<p>" passage 2 speaks of people who don’t believe in the theory of passage 1 (something along those lines)"</p>
<p>“useless (I don’t remember if that was the exact answer, but it was asking about how the second passage’s author felt about that process that might negate environmental benefits, I think another answer choice was Harmful, which I guess could also be a possible answer)”</p>
<p>What were the questions for these ones?</p>
<p>I asked this earlier, but no on answered… :(</p>
<p>what’s a guessing penalty?</p>
<p>^essentially a guessing penalty is a 1/4 deduction if you got a problem wrong. So when your test is scored, besides the # correct being lowered, an additional 1/4 point is taken off.</p>
<p>Okay he wrote: "-4 (3 wrong, -1 guessing penalty) "</p>
<p>So wouldn’t wrong answers also be considered guessing penalty?</p>
<p>WHAT? I’M SO CONFUSED. SORRY GUYS</p>
<p>“showing the reason why Machu Piccu was an important place (the special architecture)”</p>
<p>" passage 2 speaks of people who don’t believe in the theory of passage 1 (something along those lines)"</p>
<p>“useless (I don’t remember if that was the exact answer, but it was asking about how the second passage’s author felt about that process that might negate environmental benefits, I think another answer choice was Harmful, which I guess could also be a possible answer)”</p>
<p>What were the questions for these ones?</p>
<p>I’m posting this one more time. PLEASE SOMEONE ANSWER ME!</p>
<p>@Leicester
- Yes, it was in section 1.
- I would also like to see a discussion of the Winston Churchill question. I put no error for that one.</p>
<p>@biovball
I remember that one too, and “infinite” is correct for that one.</p>
<p>@kimmylouie I think he means he got 3 wrong which would take away 3 points. Then minus .75 for the penalty which would round to 1 and take away an additional point.</p>
<p>@my88keys
- The question was asking why the author included descriptions about the great architecture at Macchu Picchu.
- This was from the two passages about free will.
- If hydrogen did not have environmental benefits, what would the other author say in response?</p>
<p>@kimmylouie
Yeah, you get points off for answering the question wrong.</p>
<p>Wait… what was the Winston Churchill question. Writing???</p>
<p>Also what is “creative philosophy” question again??</p>
<p>@charterusefox, do you know what other answer options were for 1 and 3? Thank you!</p>
<p>@rainatennis
I don’t remember a Churchill question. The philosophy question was when they asked why the author of a passage made a comparison to a bluegrass musician, and the answer was to show his artistic philosophy, or something like that.*</p>
<p>@my88keys
I don’t remember the other choices, but I am 100% sure that the answer for number 1 was to show the specialness of Machu Picchu.
I think the answer to number 2 was that the independence of American energy was important regardless of whether it helps the environment.*</p>