<p>
[quote]
I'd like to challenge sakky's earlier post about not being able to do well at mit if don't have the natural talent. tons of guys at my house have close to 5.0's and they aren't the smartest group - they just work hard when they need to. if you work hard here at mit, you will do fine. if you work hard anywhere, you will do fine.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I'll put it to you this way. Why don't you make a declaration in the Tech that anybody can get a 5.0 in any major as long as he simply works hard. Or how about we just go to the MIT section of CC and you can make the same declaration. Hey, if you're right, then you will be able to defeat all challengers, right? So when some MIT student challenges your Tech article or your CC posting and talks about how he/she workse extremely hard and still can't get anywhere close to a 5.0, you're going to be prepared to call that person a liar, right? </p>
<p>Or let me put it to you this way. We both know that MIT has a strong reputation for rigor and difficulty. You pick up any college guide and you can read about MIT's penchant for difficult coursework and extremely hard-working students. You can read the comments of MIT profs and administrators lauding MIT's tradition for refusing to make things easy for the students, and how having an MIT degree instantly confers seriousness of purpose and proof of toughness and work ethic. And you may know how MIT vies with a certain school in Pasadena every year for being the 'toughest' school in the country.</p>
<p>But now think about what you're saying. You're basically saying that all of that is a sham - that people who are, by your words, not the best, can come to MIT and still get close to straight A's. In other words, MIT is not really that rigorous and tough at all. If it is really true what you're saying, then the world ought to have far less respect for people who get do well at MIT. After all, if what you are saying is true, then you can get high grades at MIT without being that smart. I guess it's good for future employers to know that so they will discount MIT's apparently undeserved reputation. Are you really prepared to publicly contradict MIT's vaunted reputation for toughness? </p>
<p>
[quote]
p.s. i know one of the duke med school admissioners personally and he told me that they do take into account the difficulty of the school.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Admissions officers can SAY anything they want. Yet it still doesn't explain why is it that admitted MIT premeds seem to require the same kinds of grades as other people who get admitted. If it was really true that compensation was given, then MIT people should be getting in with lower grades, right? So why doesn't that happen?</p>
<p>What I think is occurring is that admissions officers might actually believe what they're saying. But the way they have actually set up the admissions system is that if you don't have decent grades, you won't even be invited to submit the secondary app, and it is your secondary app that is actually read carefully by a human being. And there are PLENTY of MIT students that don't have decent grades. Again, if you don't believe me, let's make a posting on the MIT section.</p>