<p>I have been struggling with critical reading for a while now. After constantly being stuck in the 650s range, I have finally managed to get myself up to the low 700s, which is great and I'm satisfactory, since my other subject scores are pretty strong. But I know I can improve myself, so I have tried to review my wrong answers and analyze why my answer was wrong, and why the correct answer is correct. But what exactly does this do? How exactly is this going to improve my critical reading score? I understand that it shows you which questions you need to work on the most (like function, inference, vocab, etc...) but each question is specific to the passage. It isn't like math where you can correct a problem and realize that you solve these types of problems by using special right triangles. And it isn't like writing where you can see which grammar rules mess you up on the critical reading section. Critical reading questions are specific to the passage. So how is understanding why I got, let's say, an inference question wrong on a passage about planetary exploration, going to help me do an inference question on a passage about, let's say, a scientific discovery?</p>
<p>Essentially I'm asking, am I doing this "analyze incorrect answers" method correctly (by looking at the correct answer and rationalizing why that is correct), and in doing so, how am I benefiting from it? </p>